GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO IDENTIFY THE STAFF SHOWING PARTICULAR APTITUDE AND RECORDED THEIR WORK ASSESSMENTS AND THE CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS AND IDENTIFY

When the Constitution of India came into force on January 26,1950 we the people had fettered our right to free speech guaranteed under article 19(1) (a) by reasonable restrictions--libel, decency and morality and security of state or attempt to overthrow a government--through article 19(2) . During the last seventy five years number of judgements had been ordered on the captioned subject expanded and enriched the width and content of free speech, rebuffing legislative or executive attempts to restrict the same on any grounds, real or imaginary, other than the reasonable restrictions prescribed in the article 19(2) of the Constitution. Supreme Court favoured free speech by striking down section 66A of the information technology Act . As for as clause (2) to(6) of Article 19 is concerned it provides for the operation of existing laws and empowers the state government to make any law imposing reasonable restrictions in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of the country or public order or morality etc, on the exercise of these rights. The term law as per article 13(3) of the constitutional includes any ordinance, order, bye-law, rule regulation, notification , custom or usage having the force of law. As such the fundamental rights of the free speech and expression issued since , 1950 but the right to information and the right to public service guarantee released by the parliamentary democracy during 2005 and now government is reluctant to follow the original shape and standard of the said Act and rules as per the provision made and created for the welfare of people of country and related to the transparency and accountability of the administration as well as revelation of information in actual practice with other public interests including efficiency in the administration and efficient operations of the Government functiono, optimum use of limited fiscal resources . The workload and responsibilities of office personnel may change to the extent possible the existing staff should be trained to operate computers and new staff should not be brought in for the purpose ie those doing the manual processing remain responsible for computerised processing, as such reallocation of work and responsibility should be done in relation to the computerised system. The staff showing particular aptitude should be identified and their aptitude recorded in their confidential reports and the work assessments.