IT IS EASY TO SAY BUT DIFFICULT TO WORK ON THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN BY RTI AND THE RTS COMPLAINTS/APPEALS, ESTABLISHING ANY DISCREPANCY IN THE DECLARED RESULTS/FINDINGS, AS SIC IN DEFUNCT POSITION

Parliament functios as a forum for democracy by the people to the people and for the people and took cognisance of the accountability for the meaningful dialogue and discussion on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be highlighted under the provision where the Government should work for accuracy and correctness of the issue based fairness and willingness to take corrective measures under the provision made by the Constitution of India in this behalf and at the same time opposition should ensure that its role is constructive and participating for the welfare of society and circle as well as communities , where the people also looking on the situation of confrontation if any  and solution made for the people of country under law code manual prefixed by the political debate on the strategy made for good governance and accountability. The same thing appears true at the levels of groups too seems to work for idea behind the discussion and dialogue and based on the public figure following the collective decision making appeared to behave in same way, where merits are seen for the betterment of the initial public perception . Finally, every group that has well done well in this meeting and event on the captioned subject definitely has capable building movement and respected moral figures existing movement protesting against the wrong doings and misleading information depending upon the evaluation of their ideas before the Authorities for decision making, with an established identity of the group for collective measures and legitimacy before the prediction for impression under evolution by their ability to growth for the such decision making process, working rigidly with mindset and character for the corrective decision making on the issue and matter and target for the merit arguments, still challenging the species by their ability for the correctness and accuracy of conscious judgement for the proved highlights:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number, 9459334377

AIM AND OBJECTIVE OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND PUBLIC SERVICE GUARANTEE MUST HAVE CLEAR VISION WHERE IT BECOMES DIFFICULT TO REPLACE IT AT THE ARGUMENTS BEFORE FAA AND SIC OR CIC, AS THE CASE MAY BE

The aim and objective of the Right to Information and the citizens charters mandatory for Ministry /departments made clear for the welfare of society and circle, taking cognisance of the reaching at Application under section 6(1) and (3) of the access to information and addressed to the public information officers for necessary compliance under law code manual prefixed by the act ibid in this behalf, where the RTI Applicants and public movements should concentrate on the captioned subject of the strength of their points before the public information officers and arguments before the FAA and SIC or CIC in case of non compliance and misleading information or incorrect and incomplete information and they must pay equal attention to the framework and architecture of their narratives, as such at later stage of the such duty by the appellant, the brain remembers the flow chart and how meaning appeared to flow where the Application established before the public information officer is difficult to replace from the record made and discussed with the all concerned. Hence it is necessary to have clear vision of the RTI and the RTS Applications, so that legitimacy appeared to originate determination of the RTI applicant may prove right act of the conscience for the demand under access to information and citizens charters mandatory for all in the society and circle:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number 9459334377

RTI AND RTS EMPOWERED TO THE CITIZENS OF THE COUNTRY WITH A MEANINGFUL DECISION-MAKING UNDER LAW AND THERE IS NO REASON TO IGNORE AND DELETE THE PROCEDURE FOR APPOINTMENTS OF THE VACANT SLOTS EXISTING IN THE SIC PLACED IN DEFUNCT POSITION SINCE LONG

Right to information has been empowered to the citizens of country right from the community development services to social impact strategy, emerging as a dynamic career allowing the people to bring transparency and accountability and the required meaningful changes made in the administrative reforms organisation, working for the welfare of society and circle and doing needful under codes for consideration working on the data based technology for the sustainable development and governance based on the delivering measurable results of the online RTI and the RTS where there exists the strategy for good governance and transparency in administration rather than merely a procedural compliance of the RTI and the RTS Activists, facing FAA and the SIC or CIC, as the case may be, list by way and virtue of which Government is responsible to follow sub section (3) of Section 12 and appoint vacant positions of the SIC and SCIC, so that people may not face delay and dereliction of duty because of such relegation in the administrative reforms found necessary by the parliamentary democracy of our country, however the state government taking no cognisance of the existing demand and public complaints before the appropriate Government for about one years of the duration and the pendency increasing day by day, however there is no meaningful results in the collaborating NGOs, task force, government agencies and the local stakeholders. The profession therefore demands individuals who can combine compassion with analytical thinking and strategic decision making on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be made  in position for the coming future of welfare of the citizens of state related to the community service and good governance and citizens charters mandatory for the all in democracy for the people by the people and to the people:-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number 9459334377

FORMER PRIME MINISTER SHRI MANMOHAN SINGH INTRODUCED RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 AND BRING AADHAAR FOR THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE CITIZENS OF COUNTRY

The formation of a district organisation for the purpose of carrying out the transparency and accountability established by the Former Congress Prime Minister Shri Manmohan Singh regime and programme, leaving the machinery of the Congress party free to apply itself to other purposes of the good governance and charter of public accountability, would definitely improve advantage to take benefits of the access to information and charter of public accountability for which the people are taking advantage of the demand and utility for gaining the public interest in disclosure outweighs in importance, as such if an applicant seek any information which relates to or has been supplied by a third party and that third party has treated that information as confidential, the PIO is responsible to consider whether the information should be disclosed or not. The guiding principles in such cases should be that except in the case of trade or commercial secrets protected by law, disclosure may be allowed if the public interest in disclosure outweighs in importance any possible harm or injury to the interest of such third party. However, procedure as given should be followed before disclosing such information, it may be noted that this procedure need be followed only when the third party has treated the information as confidential. Keeping in view the such conditions its duty and function could not lost a vast deal more than it has gained by this process of the formation of a distinct organisation for the purpose of carrying out the other purposes related to the benefits of the National interest instead of personal interest and it is necessary to establish the defunct State Information Commission and State Chief Information Commission under sub section (3) of Section 12 and issue necessary appointments of the designated officers in the interest of State and the administrative reforms organisation, failing which it is not possible to maintain good governance and charter of public accountability and citizens of the society and circle may feel tired and tortured by way of illegal interpretation of the law and rules and codes for the consideration under Constitution of India:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBLE FOR ENFORCING EFFICIENCY AND REDUCING DELAYS

Enforcing efficiency and reducing delays in the ongoing system of administration is becoming a problem for the state Government, where the employees are also facing various problems like shortage of staff strength etc etc and effective implementation of Government policies and programmes largely depends upon efficient and speedy disposal of the work. It is thus essential that there is promptness and efficiency in the disposal of routine work at all levels and the delays are checked, where in the supervisory officers are required to check delays in disposal of the work at every levels and step and ensure efficiency in the administration. It is also necessary to redress the public grievances with utmost promptness where in the Branch officers and the Middle level officers should assist the decision making process of the monitoring and interacting with other departments, Directorates and the field officers for ensuring timely action on all such grievances and prompt and proper disposal of the complaints, list by way and virtue of which, RTI and the RTS have also been introduced by the Government for transparency and efficiency in administration, however the state Government failed to appoint the vacant posts of SIC and SCIC for last one years of the duration, and the objective of the Annual administration report describe in factual and statistical terms have no explanation and reason, as such the coordination and accountability in decision making lying pending before the authorities like HOD and the Secretary of the departments:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

PEOPLE HAVE BEEN EMPOWERED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 AT PAR WITH THE MLA AND MP BUT IT IS REGRETTED FOR THE DEFUNCT STATUS OF SIC IN STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SINCE LONG AND THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT/OPPOSITION TAKING NO COGNISANCE FOR TRANSPARENCY IN ADMINISTRATION

Democracy for the people by the people and to the people, working for the welfare of public taking cognisance of the demand for grant where the legislature can hold a discussion, regarding estimates and the expenditure in the form of demands for grants to the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Assembly has power to assent or refuse to assent to any demand or to assent to any demand subject to reduction of the amount specified there in. No demand for grant can be made except on the recommendations of the Governor, as per Article 203 of the Constitution, estimates relating to expenditure charged upon the consolidated fund of the state are not submitted to vote of the Legislative Assembly, thought the Legislature can hold a discussion. The Members are considered private members of the house list by way and virtue of which they may hold a discussion and Rule 57 prescribes the procedure for a member desiring to call the attention of a Minister to any matter of urgent public importance and if the speaker gives his consent for the matter being raised, it is so done after the questions and before the list of business is entered upon. The Ministry may make a brief statement or ask for time to make a statement at a later hour or date. There shall be no debate on such statement, but any member may with the permission of the Speaker ask a question for the purpose of further elucidating any matter of fact. Rules 58 to 61 regulate the procedure of discussion on matters of urgent public importance. Any member desirous of raising discussion on a matter of urgent public importance can give notice specifying clearly and precisely the matter to be raised and the Speaker after calling for such information from the member and the Minister as he may consider necessary, may admit the notice and fix the date and time for taking up the discussion for a period not exceeding two and a half hours. There is no formal motion before the house for voting. The member who has given the notice may make a short statement and the Minister shall reply briefly. Any other member may be permitted to take part in the discussion. As such the Right to Information playing an important role for the welfare of citizens of the society and circle and the government /Each Ministry/Department shall, in relation to the public authorities within their jurisdiction, collect and provide such information to the State information commission, as is required to prepare the report and comply with the requirements concerning the furnishing of that information but it is regretted to point out the vacant slots of SIC and the commission is in defunct status and position for the last one years of duration and people feeling harassed due to non compliance by the appropriate Government under sub section (3) of Section 12 where the ruling and the opposition party of the house are declared responsible for needful under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

FAA MAY BE HELD RESPONSIBLE BY INFORMATION SEEKERS UNDER SECTION 19(6) OF THE RTI ACT, 2005 AS THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION IS DEFUNCT FOR ABOUT ONE YEAR OF THE DURATION WHERE IN IT IS NECESSARY FOR THE HOD TO INTERVENE UNDER THE LAW

It is directed to say that the PIO of a public authority is responsible to supply correct and complete information to the information seeker under the Right to Information Act, 2005,within the specified time. It is possible that a public information officer may not act as per provisions of the Act or an Applicant may not other wise be satisfied with the decision of the public information officer. The contains the provisions of the two appeals to tide over such situations. While the first appeal lies within the public authority itself, the second appeal lies with the State Information Commission or the central information commission, as the case may be. The State information commission (Appeal Procedure) Rules, 2005 govern the procedure for deciding appeals by the Commission. The first appellate authority is, however, required to dispose of the appeals received by him in the light of the provisions of the Act and keeping in view the principles of natural justice, a guide has been prepared for the first appellate authorities, it is expected that it would help them to perform their duties effectively. It is therefore necessary for the first appellate authorities to supply correct and complete information within the specified time to any person seeking information under the RTI act, 2005 . The first appeal lies within the public authority itself, which is made to an officer designated as the first appellate authority by the concerned public authority. The first appellate authority happens to be an officer senior in rank to the public information officer and the second appeal lies with the State information commission. The state information commission (Appeal Procedure) Rules, 2005 govern the procedure for deciding appeals by the Commission. In order to perform his /her duties effectively, the appellate authority should study the Act carefully and understand its provisions correctly and the said document must explain the important aspects of the Act, which a first appellate authority should, in particular, be conversant with :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377