NEED FOR CLARITY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOUND NECESSARY TO RELY ON THE DECISION MAKING

Artificial intelligence giving a common message to all in the exchange that the human dimensions of education was still central, even in an era dominated by intelligent machines and it is necessary to analyze the data, working for the welfare of society and circle and doing needful for transparency and accountability, as delivering personalised content and automate routine tasks, and it could not replace the empathy, judgement and moral guidance that teachers provide and guide. It is necessary for the learners to cultivate discernment, the ability to choose, what to do and how to get the accuracy and correctness from the Artificial tools to rely on, required the need based results for ethical clarity in the Artificial intelligence usage and with concern over misinformation, which is not required for the coding and principles shaping the work and conduct of the new era entrants understanding their deeper meaningful use of trial and technology for the impact on captioned subject matter deliberation taking benefits of the machines and the mind set in collaboration with human empowerment, but not replaced by the artificial intelligence. It is becoming a need of the time but it is also necessary to think critically and professionally based on the demand driven services for the good governance and potential with quality control for the proper use and exercise of technology reforms, wasting time and money by way of doubts regarding misuse of the Artificial intelligence, instead of taking useful exchanges, playing key role in the AI usage in spite of the misinformation competition between human and the machine tools:-Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association, registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number 9459334377

COMPLIANCE MECHANISM VERIFIED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE RTI ACT, 2005 BASED ON ANALYZED DATA SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED IN THE FORM OF A FLOW CHART EXPLAINING THE RANK /GRADE OF THE PUBLIC FUNCTIONARIES, INVOLVED IN DECISION-MAKING

Artificial intelligence is an integral part of learning that we can let go, so we came to know about how we can inculcate artificial intelligence in the effective learning and make it a progressive tool for enhancing the assured career , related to our day to day work and promotion of the schedule for learning the advance understanding of the education for the welfare of artificial intelligence era with values, where events and meetings may help for the needful under provision made for the required improvement of our learning skills and development of the progressive measures. Actually, it is a very impressive and knowledgeable programme of the learning and listening through online programme of the work on captioned subject, where we may learn many more things, in addition to the subject matter deliberation, virtually we are taking help of the artificial intelligence in our performance of technology and professional development criterion, required for the ability to think critically and obtain its conclusion and also to understand the doubts created by the held discussion and deliberations, where necessary help of the teachers and the guides may be taken through creative thinking of the human values among the group members and the identity of benefits from the use of technology and learning skills from the principles of advice for the improved structure of the need for clarity, where there should be no compromise for the accuracy, correctness and advantage for the good governance , as such artificial intelligence driven transformation of education was both inevitable and full of promise, required for the digital ethics and information technology argued by the various guides and speakers, taking decision on the captioned subject of chapter for the learning and impact on the focus for this advancement under law code manual prefixed by the codes for consideration and used for the system generated by the group activities and based on the analysed data, in this behalf of the teaching and learning with technology:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552, Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number, 9459334377

ORDER PASSED BY THE FAA SHOULD BE A SPEAKING ORDER, GIVING JUSTIFICATION FOR THE DECISION ARRIVED AT, AND JUSTICE SHOULD ALSO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN DONE IN THE QUASI JUDICAL FUNCTION MADE BY APPELLATE AUTHORITY

It is directed to say that the PIO of a public authority is responsible to supply correct and complete information to the information seeker under the Right to Information Act, 2005,within the specified time. It is possible that a public information officer may not act as per provisions of the Act or an Applicant may not other wise be satisfied with the decision of the public information officer. The contains the provisions of the two appeals to tide over such situations. While the first appeal lies within the public authority itself, the second appeal lies with the State Information Commission or the central information commission, as the case may be. The State information commission (Appeal Procedure) Rules, 2005 govern the procedure for deciding appeals by the Commission. The first appellate authority is, however, required to dispose of the appeals received by him in the light of the provisions of the Act and keeping in view the principles of natural justice, a guide has been prepared for the first appellate authorities, it is expected that it would help them to perform their duties effectively. It is therefore necessary for the first appellate authorities to supply correct and complete information within the specified time to any person seeking information under the RTI act, 2005 . The first appeal lies within the public authority itself, which is made to an officer designated as the first appellate authority by the concerned public authority. The first appellate authority happens to be an officer senior in rank to the public information officer and the second appeal lies with the State information commission. The state information commission (Appeal Procedure) Rules, 2005 govern the procedure for deciding appeals by the Commission. In order to perform his /her duties effectively, the appellate authority should study the Act carefully and understand its provisions correctly and the said document must explain the important aspects of the Act, which a first appellate authority should, in particular, be conversant with :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

VB -G - RAM -G, NOW REPLACING THE OLD MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME/ACT FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT , WITH EFFECT FROM 01-07-2026, MERITS AND DEMERITS IN THE SCHEDULE OF GOVERNANCE FOR RURAL AREAS, THERE OF

A time has come to survey based on the rural development, data collected from the each Gram Panchayat backed into the fulfilment of grass roots level democracy of our country, working for the welfare of rural development and employment generation, however very much related to the engaging mass decision making by the gram sabha Secretariat working under the rural empowerment recipe to further alienate the rural working class. The 73 rd Amendment empowers gram sabhas , however now fundamental aspects have been changed in the new alternative of old scheme for rural development and employment opportunities by way of VB-RAM-G issued by the solution for future course of action under Panchayati raj department and a rural programme for the related livelihood, where the government of India framing the aim and objective of the rural development instead of the state governments and the gram sabhas or the public authorities too taking cognisance of the work done by the Gram sabhas and the Gram Panchayats, list by way and virtue of which the new schedule of new programme may only bring employment opportunities to the rural people but they are not eligible to follow their own way out for resolving their local issues and barriers, entered into the system due to server errors and the Government of India seems to be dissatisfied with the working class of the rural development and now the programme has been reduced to the real word of a Panchayat Secretary, dealing with the community:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

ALL THE RTI ACTIVISTS AND VOLUNTEERS WORKING UNDER THE BANNER OF HPCD, 3552 MAY FOLLOW OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE PENDENCY OF RTI UNDER SECTION 19(6) OF THE ACT AND FOLLOW REASON BEHIND THE BARS, AND MAKE NECESSARY COMPLAINTS UNDER LAW FOR JUSTICE AND JUSTIFICATION UNDER THE PROVISION MADE JUSTICE TO COMMON MAN

All the activists and volunteers working under the banner of RTI welfare Group registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh are requested to perform their compliance and communication made with the department of Administrative reforms organisation and take cognisance of the work field sanctions and approval made by the department of administrative reforms or the Deputy Commissioners and the Heads of the departments, as the case may be, so that the cases pending finalization over for three months may be highlighted before the Administrative Secretary for intervention under law code manual prefixed by the RTI Act, 2005 under section 19(6) of the RTI act and too the RTS act adjudication, where it is necessary for the department concerned to have justice on the captioned subject matter deliberation required for the decision making at the levels of the Secretary of the Department, as such intervention of the department is a genuine right and claim of the applicants, for which RTI welfare Association doing needful however it is necessary to demand for the pendency and removal of pendency with reason, so that departmental proceedings may be processed under law code manual prefixed by the pendency of such cases, after 3 months of the duration, being this responsibility of the applicants and also the department concerned to furnish monthly statement of cases pending finalization over for 3 months and have justification under section 19(6) of the RTI act adjudication and the Citizens charters mandatory for the all Ministries/Departments and the public Authorities, taking due course of law of limitations and the tentative period required for the alternative decision making at the levels of the Government working under the guidelines of the Chief Secretary and the Chief Minister of the state, where at present no SIC and SCIC working in the office of the State Information Commission and the SIC kept defunct for which it is necessary to have necessary compliance in the matter and bring it to the notice of the entire Government and the public authorities, responsible to follow RTI act adjudication and too the RTS act review and revision of cases mandatory for all responsible authorities working under the control of the appropriate Government in this behalf of the correspondence and complaints for needful under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India, in this behalf:-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

REITERATION OF GUIDELINES AFTER REGULAR INTERVALS AND UNDER SECTION 26 OF THE RTI ACT, 2005 AND VARIOUS PROVISIONS FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM, PUBLISHED FOR RIGHT EARNEST

The public information officers/First Appellate Authorities should keep in mind the salient features of the guidelines in supply of information to the information seeker and disposal of first Appeal respectively, so that information seekers may not resort to filing of second Appeals before the information Commissions. The relevant salient features of the guidelines are reiterated below for consideration of the public information officers and the First Appellate authorities. As such section 26 of the RTI Act, requires the government to compile a guide containing such information, in an easily comprehensible form and manner, as may reasonably be required by a person who wishes to exercise any right specified in the Act, Further, it requires the Government to update the Guide at regular intervals. Accordingly a guide on the Act was published online mode on 28-11-2013(Chapter 111) to help all the stakeholders viz. Information seekers in getting information, public information officers in dealing with the RTI applications, First Appellate authorities in taking cogent decisions on Appeals and the public authorities in implementing various provisions of the Act in right earnest. It is particularly mentioned here that despite of the orders of the FAA, concerned public information officers are taking no cognisance of the information referred and preferred by the Applicants in this behalf of the provision made and the Applicants are suffering because of such, delay and dereliction of duty, even clear vision under section 19(6) of the RTI Act, 2005 , where deciding Appeals under the RTI Act is a quasi judical function, It is therefore necessary, that the Appellate authority should see to it that the justice is not only done, but it should also appear to have been done. In order to do so, the order passed by the Appellate authority should be a speaking order giving justification for the decision arrived at :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW FAIR POLITICS AND DECISION-MAKING UNDER GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CITIZENS CHARTERS, MANDATORY FOR ALL MINISTRIES AND THE DEPARTMENTS

It is not understand about the decision making of all parties related to the priortisation of electoral populism over sound economic governance by the present successive governments led to excessive dependence on freebies politics and reckless fiscal management, creating a dangerous debt trap of the states, even require corrective measures where strict compliance of law code manual found necessary after big debt on the states as well as on the Central Government, and it is necessary to curb the wasteful expenditure and politically motivated decision making, instead of to follow clear guidelines of the codes for consideration processed for the all in positive measures instead of wrong implementation of the instructions on captioned subject matter deliberation required to be decided on the merits for each . Political parties and the politicians may be held responsibility for people  oriented development programmes instead of political interference for monopoly on such issues of the creation for selfish motive behind the policy frame work. An independent agency must be empowered to deal with the such problems and accountability, so that people may get their benefits as per eligibility and criterion fixed for the welfare of all in the society and circle and demanding their genuine rights and interests on the basis of law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf as such it is not democratic way of the development to impose wrong assessment of decision making and ignore law code manual instead of doing corrective measures for the administrative reforms, found necessary under the Right to Information act and citizens charters mandatory for the all Ministries/departments and the public authorities, working for the good governance and accountability:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377