SKILLING IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REQUIRES EXPERTS OPINION AND UNDERSTANDING IN THE PROFESSIONAL FIELD OF DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Artificial intelligence are expanding capabilities across the understanding and advancement, prediction and creativity for the professional knowledge and skill development programmes, required for the safety, fairness and accuracy as well as transparency and Accountability for the work field design presentation and procedural processing of the research on captioned subject matter deliberations extended to cover all statutory and discretionary operations of that part of the profession which is under discussions and decision making hierarchy of the specific stages, however final decision and conclusion still under consideration. In the routine work of good governance, Government functionaries are required to make decisions in a discretionary manner but broad guiding principles are laid down in some rules or the other. For example the General Financial Rules lay down procedures for a variety of operations relating to the government finances, how sanction must be accorded for incurring expenditure, how losses to the Government must be reported, how responsibility for the losses may be fixed on any government servant;how budget demand for grants prepared and submitted, how public Works must be sanctioned and executed, how commodities and services may be procured by a public authority, are all explained in the law code manuals, which are updated from time to time. The challenge is to present a simplified version of the decision- making procedure that is of interest to a common man, demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance. Journalism is unfolding in an era defined by a deep research and information paradox, where despite an explosion of available information, citizens in many democracies are less informed about the public affairs. The distinction definitely lies , in the fact that information, and journalism are not the same, for which the RTI and the RTS must have institutional mechanism through data based opinion and understanding for the documentary index and rank /grade of the public functionaries involved in such decision making of the performance, clearly explained before the expert committee, working for the design and development of this operation of the transparency and charter of public accountability:-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

MINUTES OF ONLINE RTI MEETING CONVENED UNDER THE BANNER OF NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE ON THE EXERCISE JURISDICTION OF ARTICLE 226 &32 OF CONSTITUTION, A CAUTION TO LITIGANTS THEREOF

It was an occasion today on 03 -6-2026 while attended the online meeting of National Campaign Committee right from 11am to 2.45 pm which has been convened by Shri Shivanand Divewdi and Shri Praveen Patel and highlighted on the captioned subject matter deliberation discussed for the caution to litigants perils of invoking Article 226&32 of the Constitution of India, processed for arguments before the members by Shri Mathew An Advocate of the Supreme Court of India, Shri Rahul Singh former SIC Madhya pradesh and Shri Virender Thakker, Resource person from the Uttrakhand along with prominent members of the house Shri Krishan Lal Barua,, Shri Manoj Kumar Rajput Shri. BS Choudhary Advocate Delhi High Court Advocate Rajendra Shri prehlad Shri Vasudev Advocate prasant Kumar and Ashawni Tiwari. Shri Methew told the members of house that at present Article-32 is becoming unworkable due to many reasons more so Court can not make law but interpretation for the jurisprudence judiciary system for law, so the Government of India intervening for the PIL however it is working for the affected persons and decision making under law where in a common law can not denied for the implementation, list by way and virtue of which Right to Information is becoming a fundamental of the law and Act obtained by the individual for access to information and review of misleading information and denied information for the particulars of recipients of concessions and permits or authorization granted by it where it is necessary to provide reasons for its administrative or quasi-judicial decisions to affected persons. Futher more Shri Virender Thakker also issued guideline on the implementation of the PIL and other remedies available for the general public and the poor people demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance. Questions asked by the house of members also replied on the captioned subject matter deliberations related to the fiduciary disclosure of meaningful relationships with the connectivity and third party disclosures in terms of guidelines, dated, 7-11-2019 and it has been decided that the task of undertaking transparency audits may be given to any Government training institutes by Ministry/Department/Public Authority, under the Central or the State Governments:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number 9459334377

IN ADDITION TO RTI, RTS THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MAY ALSO BE USED AS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BY THE CITIZEN TO SAVE THEIR REASONABLE TIME, SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF RESOURCES AND FACILITIES FOR GOOD GOVERNANCE

No doubt the RTI is working for the welfare of society and community as well as individual for access to information actively taking cognisance of the future problems of the area and circle and asking for the improvement of such realisation under provision made by the Government however it is not a duty of the RTI activist and volunteer to follow lawsuit and they are not parties with a direct stake in the dispute observed by the identity in the work and conduct of the documentary proof taken from the public authority in this behalf of the demand under public service and verified under the provision of settlement for good governance and accountability where the department of administrative reforms and the entire government held responsible for such consequences of disparity made and enforced with any area or circle as well as an individual concerned, for which it is necessary to have representation before the appropriate Government responsible for doing needful under the provision made and in generally it is felt that such complaints are decided by the public authorities, however it is necessary to explain the purposes made for the information disseminated widely and in such form and manner which is easily accessible to the public, fiduciary related for disclosure with all relevant facts formulating important policies for the decision making of representation for the effective implementation of the schemes and programmes, but the people does not follow their proposed plan, as required under the provision of development and accountability for each area and circle or an individual, as the case may be, and consider it their disparity against the given schedule for service and utility. All the three wings of our democracy are doing their duty under provision made and it is also necessary to follow their observation under the programme and schemes and facilities available to the general public, so that matter may also be highlighted under every decision and announcement of the public corridor too responsible for the good governance and charter of public accountability, where matter may also be processed, for the enforcement of the rights conferred by Part 111( Fundamental Rights) and for any other purpose under article 226 of the Constitution, but it is for the individual to chose to represent themselves in the court, moreover now a days Artificial intelligence and the technology access helps litigants overcome problems, related to distance, terrain and the finance:- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number, 9459334377

HONOURABLE CHIEF MINISTER AND THE LEADER OF OPPOSITION ARE REQUESTED TO REPLY THE PUBLIC " WHY THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION IS IDLE AND DEFUNCT, SINCE FOR ABOUT ONE YEAR OF DURATION ?

Friends, It is a matter of fact and concern to be notice by the every citizen of country facing various problems in the system of democracy for the people by the people and to the people that RTI has been empowered to the citizens of country under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf, but at the same time it is necessary to follow procedural compliance and processing of the access to information and follow powers and duties of its officers and employees and the procedure followed in the decision making process including channels of the supervision and accountability and the norms set by it for the discharge of its functions. The rules, regulations, instructions manuals and records, held by it or under its control or used by its employees for discharging its functions and a statement of the categories of documents that are held by it or under its control. The particulars of arrangements that exists for consultation with, or representation by the members of the public in relation to the formulation of its policy or implementation thereof. A statement of the boards, councils, committees and other bodies, consisting of two or more persons constituted as its part or for the purpose of its advice, and as to whether meetings of those boards, councils and committees and other bodies are open to the public, or the minutes of such meetings are accessible for the public. The particulars  of the facilities available to citizens for obtaining information, including the working hours of a library or reading room, if maintained for the public use and such other information as may be prescribed and there after update these publications, every year and public all relevant facts while formulating important policies or announcing the decisions which affect the public and also to provide reasons for its administrative reforms or quasi judicial decision to affected persons. Keeping in view the above guidelines for the public welfare and use it is necessary for the ruling party and also for the opposition to issue necessary reason under sub -section (3) and section 12 of the RTI act, 2005 , why the information commission is in defunct position since long and the working machinery sitting idle without work :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

RTI ACTIVISTS AND VOLUNTEERS PLAYING AN IMPORTANT ROLE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING OR A "JAN AUDIT MANCH", RELATED TO DATA BASED PROBLEMS, IT IS THEREFORE NECESSARY TO PREFER THE TASK - FORCE FOR ENSURE FRIENDLY COORDINATION AND DATA BASED COMPLETION CERTIFICATES, REQUIRED FOR GOOD GOVERNANCE

Political parties are required to maintain report card of the aspirants for the election to Urban development and the Rural development of Panchayati raj department, now a days trying for the selection through their senior leaders of the party forum for selection. Keeping in view the social service required for these highlights of the election, there is no opportunity for the winners except to work for the society and area of their post, as such they must follow the existing problems of the public and the people are given opportunity to discuss their problems with the implementation institutions and understand their problems where functionaries compliance with all requirements could not be ignored by the representatives of their area and circle related to the post for service under law code manual prefixed by the efficiency and efficacy shown in discharge of duties and exercising of powers as per the general activities and analysis of facts processed for the welfare of general public, and grievances for the redressal for which experience and access to information also matters under such conditions of the demand for control of any official machinery, but it is regretted to point that very few people are taking cognisance of the Right to information Act, 2005 and the charter of public accountability and the people facing problems because of the delay and dereliction of duty where the representatives are also denied by the administration to have action under the provision made for display, even at the panchayat levels where it is required to be updated after quarter and half years duration of the work, done and the progress made at the site of work and people are themselves responsible to monitor their problems and follow higher office and authorities in such cases of the law of limitations. It is therefore necessary for the public to select and elect honest and hard working social workers in the field of Urban development department and the Panchayati raj department failing which it is difficult to actively process the procedure of the required access to information and it becomes essential for the public too to assist the government and have justice from the system of governance where pressure on the office and authorities may do needful under Right to information and charter of public accountability otherwise no effective check on the captioned subject may be carried out for completion certificate of the work and schemes and data will remain in the hidden agenda of the "JAN AUDIT MANCH" :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

SHOULD THE JURISDICTION OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) BE RECONSIDERED?

Public interest litigation (PIL) emerged as a transformative judicial innovation aimed at widening access to justice for the poor people and the marginalised . This was achieved by relaxing the strict rules of standing to permit representative actions, and by broadening the scope of judicial notice to allow courts to take suo motu cognisance of the public issues and convert them into litigations , however concerns have been raised, about the misuse of this jurisdiction, more over now union Government has urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the PIL framwork altogether, citing the rise of agenda driven litigation, as such now there is a question that should the PIL jurisdiction be reconsidered ?  and now the question of conversation must be discussed for the evolution of PIL. :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377

FIDUCIARY EXEMPTION CANNOT DENY AN EMPLOYEE ACCESS TO INFORMATION CONCERNING HIMSELF-- DELHI HIGH COURT DECISION TOO ADOPTED BY CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER PUNJAB.

Since empowerment of the Right to Information Act, 2005 to date at this juncture, it is necessary to clear some misconceptions about the RTI Act, as the Act provides access to the all informations that is available and existing. This is clear from a combined reading of Section 3 and the definitions of information and right to information under clause (f) and (j) of the section 2of the Act. If a public authority has any information in the form of data, or an analyzed data, or abstracts or statistics, an Applicant may access such information, subject to the exemption in section 8 of the Act, But where the information sought is not a part of the record of a public authority, and where such information is not required to be maintained under any law or the rules or regulations of public authority, the act does not cast an obligation upon the public authority, to collect or collate such non available information and then furnish it to an appellant. A public authority is also not required to furnish information which require drawing of inference and/or making of assumptions. It is also not required to provide advice or opinion to an Applicant, nor require to obtain and furnish any opinion or advice to an Applicant. The reference to opinion or advice in the. definition of information in Section 2(f) of the Act,, only referes to such material available in the records of the public authority. Many public authorities have, as a public relation exercise, provide advice, guidance and opinion to the citizens. But that is purely voluntarily and should not be confused with any obligation under the RTI Act. It is particularly mentioned here that said guidelines issued by the DoP&T memo number 1/18/2011-IR dated 16-9-2011 however now it has been decided by the Punjab State information Commission that fiduciary exemptions under the RTI act cannot casually invoked to block routine administrative information and the Chief Information Commissioner Shri Inderpal Singh passed the order on an Appeal over withheld appointment order under PCS Register A-2. Applicant sought copies of PPSC recommendations, legal advice, file inspection and the action taken on his representations . The Commission directed disclosure of records and file inspection within 30 days and cited Delhi High Court ruling in State Bank of India vs Mohd Shahjahan, saying fiduciary exemption cannot deny an employee access to information concerning himself:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377