FORMER PRIME MINISTER LATE SHRI RAJIV GANDHI INTRODUCED THIS PROCUREMENT OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN COUNTRY WHICH IS NOW WORKING FOR THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OF COMMON POOL PERFORMANCE (TASKS) FOR (MIS).

People working on the captioned subject of demand under public service responding on behalf of Government service and taking credit of work done as doing their duty under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India and related to the ruling party corridor, however the work done by the government agencies must have appropriate guidelines and instructions for the procedural compliance laid with the provision for accomplishment list by way and virtue of which it is necessary to follow instructions and guidelines on the captioned subject instead of doing wrong interpretation of law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf. As such provision of the RTI and the RTS act adjudication has been made by the Government to take cognisance of the such lapse and ill fated decisions issued by the higher authorities and related to the public opinion and welfare of the general public demanding their duty from the Government authorities as well as the public authorities for which people may also approach the Courts of Law, where found necessary and realising political interference in the matter, enforcing the public authorities to do their work according to their wishes or face the consequences. As such RTI is becoming an important use of the power function by general public taking cognisance of the misuse of power corridor by the officers and the public representations even though it is necessary to follow deciding Appeals under section 19(6) of the RTI Act, 2005 , considered a quasi -judicial function. It is therefore necessary , that the appellate authority should see to it that the justice is not only done, but it should also appear to have been done. In order to do so, the order passed by the appellate authority should be a speaking order giving justification for the decision arrived at. If an appellate authority comes to a conclusion that the appellant should be supplied information in addition to what has been supplied by the Public Information Officer, he may either (1) pass an order directing the public information officer to give such information to the applicant;or (2) he himself may give information to the appellant, while disposing of the appeal. In the first case, the appellate authority should ensure that the information ordered by him to be supplied is supplied to the appellant immediately. It would, however be better if the appellate authority chooses the second course of action and he himself furnishes the information along with the order passed by him in the matter. It is particularly mentioned here that the FAAs are totally depending upon the Public information officers and taking no cognisance of the second course of action demanded by the Act ibid list by way and virtue of which number of complaints are pending before the SIC and CIC as well as the department of administrative reforms however HOD and the Secretary of department taking no cognisance of the such duty issued for the welfare of people and general public facing problems because of the delay and dereliction of duty :-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number 9459334377