According to the RTI Act -2005 and it's description made by the law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf, the Chief Information commissioners and the Information commissioners are appointed by the president on the recommendations of the Committee headed by the Prime minister and comprising the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha and similar action is taken in the states by the Chief Minister for nominating the Commissioners in their states however if the ruling party ignore the law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf it would be against the norms prescribed by the Act and for which the department of the personnel and training would be held responsible to function as per the given schedule for the appointments of the said Commissioners virtually appointed to resolve the grievances of the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance. Generally the Administration people are given said appointments and even the retired Chief Secretaries are demanding said posts of the states as well as the Central Information commissioners where in it is found ill fated behavior of the such people who had enjoyed highest level position and dignity of the state prerogatives for which neither such people should apply for the appointment of Commissioners nor the Chief Minister and the others concerned should prefer such people at the post of Commissioners where common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance, moreover the work and conduct as well as the performance of the commissioners are limited with in the law code manual of the RTI act adjudication and the RTS act verification of records produced before the office and institution of the Commissioners virtually working for the transparency and accountability in the administration.