STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS COULD NOT REJECT (APPEALS FOR HEARING) BEFORE LISTENING , IF THE DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY ATTACHED FOR REVIEW.

It is a matter of fact and concern at the level of appropriate government working for the welfare of society and circle that the State information commissioners of Himachal Pradesh are rejecting the Appeals preferred by the applicant under law code manual prefixed by the Act ibid in this behalf , without any opportunity for hearing to the appellants which is not correct and justified in the interest of transparency and accountability for which matter must be heard by the Commissioners instead of rejecting the Appeals before hearing failing which there is no mechanism of the RTI and the RTS act adjudication particularly empowered to the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance and for which the SIC or CIC functioning at the level of court for general public hearings and declared responsible to institutional mechanism for strengthening of the grievances redressal system maintained for the good governance and accountability however if the Appeals are not heard by the office and authorities at this consensus and denial for appearing before the forum for justice under RTI and the RTS act adjudication there is no social audit and justice against the functioning of the public authorities as such Appeals are preferred against the order and findings of the FAA and PIOs. It is a social audit and observation of the Commissioners against the work and conduct of the public authorities and for which the verification of the recorded documents found essential to elicit the correct position and investigation of the recording made by the FAA and prayer sought by the Appellants. The RTI activists, volunteers and the resource persons are taking hearings after spending time and money for the opportunity given to entitlement provided by the law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf for which no one has been empowered to reject the Appeals before proceedings of the hearing to appellant are concluded at the level of the forum for redressal of grievances and relief sought by the appellant verified under law code manual prefixed by the RTI and the RTS act adjudication for which the Himachal Pradesh SIC taking both ways trial and disposal of the complaints/Hearings for enquire in to the matter of previous proceedings taken by the FAA and challenged before the Second Appellate authority SIC or CIC by the Applicants/RTI activists and the volunteers working on the subject matter deliberation required to be verified by the higher authorities as challenging the delays, dereliction of duty and misleading information, as well as incorrect and incomplete informations supplied by the PIOs where in the government is responsible for accuracy, timely action and correctness as well as completeness of the informations sought by the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance and for which now the Commissioners are functioning to enquire in to the matter and do the needful under law code manual for which there is no reason to reject the Appeals before hearing taken by the Commissioner appointed for the expected duty and function issued by the Government for work and the commencement report of each and every case preferred by the applicants under law code manual and necessary findings of the competent higher authority must be brought to the notice of the aggrieved persons demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance and working for the transparency and accountability where report of the commissioners should be adjudicated under law code manual instead of rejection of the Appeals before hearing for the enquiry of the case submitted for the observation, by the RTI activists and volunteers working for the good governance and accountability and demanding administrative reforms from the Commissioners against the non compliance and wrong interpretation as well as incomplete information and the misleading information challenged by the applicants to follow penal action and the disciplinary action against the defaulters.