HPPWD SHOULD FOLLOW PAY COMMISSION REPORT (3-1-2022) AND ALSO FOLLOW GUIDELINES OF THE ADVISORY DEPARTMENTS TO DECIDE FORMER CASES OF ACPS, INSTEAD OF WRONG DEAL OF CHARGE SHEETS AND CCS&CC&A RULES, 1965.

The functional post of Extra Assistant Engineer was compulsory retired after reduction in grades and withheld of increments by the disciplinary authorities responsible to follow option and decision making by the advisory departments , but it is regretted for the wrong deal of case by disciplinary authorities On the other hand the pay commission report is clearly indicating that increments of the senior Government employees should have not been withheld/stopped by way of penalty or otherwise and option would be considered final and irrevocable one, however there is no follow up action on the captioned subject , even the department of Finance and the Administrative reforms again and again writing to the HPPWD regarding to follow the past confirmations of the department and remove illegal penalty of higher post issues to junior Engineer after -18 years of the regular service and in semblance to the promotion for others working in the joint cadre of AE and EE. As such it is the duty and responsibility of the disciplinary authorities to follow wrong assessment and wrong deal of dynamic ACPS where there is no denial for preference to follow second channels of the promotion and for which letter of modification issued under rule 10(5) (c) of CCS &CC&A rules, 1965 is proof since, 21-5-2004 , however there is no correction of wrong assessment of ACPS, even penalty proposed under rule 12 of CCS&CC&A rules, 1965 amended to rule, 11 vide number SE -X -BLP -6521-26 dated 31-8-2007 is also proof and evidence on the record of disciplinary authorities since long but there is no follow up action and correction of wrong assessment of ACPS by the Head of the Department from where wrong assessment of ACPS enforced till date of the option and preference by an employee to have benefits of the second channel of the promotion so guaranteed the department of administrative reforms and DoP&T memo number-14 dated 3-12-2014 . The department of HPPWD is taking no cognisance of the advisory departments and it is necessary to have decision on the captioned subject after pay commission report issued as on 3-1-2022 but there is no review by the HPPWD, even clear decision of the OA number 2073/01 dated 18-10-06 and 3207/2006 and CWP(T) 15857/2008 dated 25-5-2011 but the HOD taking no positive steps to report the compliance demanded by the Principal Secretary PWD in this behalf of the review and revision of dynamic ACPS too noticed by the Central Information commission in addition to others on 3-6-2025 for clarification , charges and complaints of wrong assessment and adverse affects pointed by the HP Finance, Personnel, Law and administrative reforms is also proof and evidence:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377