SUPER SELECTION OF A POST IS GRANTED UNDER THE PURVIEW OF VACANT SLOTS OF CADRE/GRADE AND PREFERENCE AND OPTION OF AN EMPLOYEE IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO HAVE DUE BENEFITS OF HIS HIGHER/HIGHEST (R&P) SEMBLANCE

Assured career progression Scheme issued to junior Engineer after eighteen years of regular service in the scale and grade has been granted under the provision of an preference and option of an employee with the designation of post EAE for which rule 10(5) (c) of the CCS &CC&A Rules 1965 is very clear as allowing modification for the due benefits under this provision of the preference and option of an employee but at the same time claim of this post is a super selection of the cadre /grade where an employee is eligible after eight years of service for first promotion and how it could be denied for the benefits of the promotional level promotion of an employee under law code manual prefixed by the CCS &CC&A Rules, 1965 being senior in rank and grade than draftsman in the joint cadres of AE and EE but it is also wrong to issue second promotion of junior Engineer after ineligible criterion of the service required for the next promotion of the Executive Engineer , where first promotion of the Junior engineer is lagging behind till more than thirty two years of regular service in the one post. Under these conditions of the Recruitment and promotion rules of the junior engineer applicable for the second promotion of Executive Engineer the department is wrong on the captioned subject of allowing personal promotion to such AEs who are not eligible for the qualified service of second promotion. As such there is no reason to follow penalty and reduction in grade after issue of letter of modification where one has opted for the promotional level promotion allowed after 18 years of the regular service and the second promotion is wrong under the circumstances where no first promotion is becoming due eligibility of an employee however optional promotion of cadre /grade preferred after 18 years of regular service is a fundamental right of an employee (EAE) and definitely a super selection of the post of an employee as facing deep long prevailed stagnation in the cadre /grade and assurance given by the Principal Secretary PWD on 17-7-1987 in this regard is proof and evidence for which super selection is a better placed way out for the benefits of ACPS instead of the wrong interpretation of R&P rules and allowing the second promotion after four and five years of regular service in the scale and grade. As such now the final review and revision of former cases is very much over since pay commission report and it is better to take advise from the department of HP Finance and Personnel instead of unnecessary delay and wrong assessment of cases since 3-10-1991 to date of decision-making and wrong assessment of ACPS, when HP Finance time and again writing to have necessary advice on the captioned subject instead of the delay and dereliction of duty at this stage placement of higher/highest promotional level placement of EAE and XEN issued to junior Engineer for the eligible super selection of an employee under the provision made for this recovery of the Assured Career progression sachem where claim is by way of the option of an employee and preference of employee is /was a Grant in ACPS :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number, 9459334377