Working of private sector organizations and the RTI act 2005

Private sector public  dealing organization s have also been included in the RTI query as well as complaints so it has become essential to issue necessary notification in this behalf of the duty by public authority and the management should also appoint their PIOs for attending the RTI applications at their own for which full particular along with phone number of the officer on duty for PIO is required to be highlighted at the entry of the office or wall writing  of the particulars by head of the department is required to be mentioned by the head of the institution so that public may use and exercise this appliance required as by the act ibid. The honourable Supreme court has also issued some specific introductory   instructions to the public authority for further orders in matter by way and virtue of the which now the GOI as well as the state government and department of personnel and training would take further cognisance in matter and the notification as desired by the honourable  Supreme court would take place in the public authority for further dealing of the cases at the level of the  FAA for which  authority for registration may took decision of recommendations regarding review of the such cases where the applicant is not satisfied with the information of the PIO and desired for the appeal under the act ibid more over the review and revision of such cases where the applicant is unsatisfied with the information supplied by the PIO would depend totally on the size and shape of the organization or the institution as such FAA is responsible to clear the position of such cases under law and the rules as well as time to time issued guidelines for further dealing of the cases very much pertinent to the public authority  In the cases where  FAA is with in the  set up of private organization the cases may be directly filed before the SIC or the CIC however necessary notification has become duty of the public authority after orders of the honourable Supreme court of India and could not be delayed.