EVERY RTI INFORMATION HAS IT'S OWN INTEREST AND PURPOSE FOR DEMAND UNDER PUBLIC UTILITIES

PRIVACY COULD BE RELATED TO THE SECRECY BUT IT COULD NOT BE ISOLATED FROM THE PUBLIC FUNDING FOR USE AND EXERCISE OF THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNANCE AND THE ENQUIRIES UNDER RTI:- The RTI act publications have been empowered by the government to enquire about the information contained in this behalf of the transparency in administration and removal of corruption from the society and circle.The number of cases has been decided on the pattern standard of SC decision so issued in the case of Deshpande which is not correct and justified under the provision made by RTI act publications . The merits and demerits of each case are never similar inthe eye que of demands under RTI act 2005  hence there is no logic and reason to decide cases on the way as case file of Desh Pandey has been considered by the judiciary.Section 8(1)(j) in the case of privacy and secrecy would be identical in every case file of the RTI act 2005 and there is no reason to follow old decision of the SIC or CIC or the HC and SC for denying informations to the applicants as such every case has separate identity and situation for larger public utilities and the interests more over there is no logic to follow restrictions in the cases of Public funding utilities and consider it a privacy of the citizens The application of section 8 (1) (j) could be restricted on the basis of following conditions and the disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of the country,relation with the foreign state or lead to incitement of an offence.And the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege of Parliament or the state legislature.The informations which could be brought to the notice of Parliament and the state legislature could not be denied to the citizens of this country