GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO CONTINUE THE PRODUCTIVE POLICY AND SCHEMES FOR THE WELFARE OF BENEFICIARIES, INSTEAD OF CREATING BIGGER LOSSES AND POOR PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT FUNDING FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE PROFESSIONAL WORRIES.

The government is responsible to consider price rise of the essential commodities and extension of the food grain subsidy to various classes of the citizens of country , as such it is not correct to say that there is no impact of the food subsidy on the financial exchequer of the deficit fiscal target, as compared to the challenge of the price rise in the global crude oil prices. The extension of the free ration scheme is benefitting more than half of the population of the country and for which the government is paying financial aid and help to the farmers required to improve their financial status and position of their work and technology. Major subsidies if increased may affect adverse against the work culture of the farming and marketing for the absolute impact of these schemes on the captioned subject of difficulties in withdrawing the ongoing policies of the government, as such merits and demerits of the each steps of the extension of these schemes may create risk for the future implications for which the government is responsible to verify the progress of these parameters adopted by the government of India and too by the state governments where in the green houses schemes of the government have came to an end since the long and now people have again started cultivation of their lands on the old pattern of open farming for their land cultivation, however the government has spent thousands of crores of the subsidy on this scheme of the geen houses during the corresponding period of the benefits of said schemes to the medium and low level farmers where more than eighty percent of the subsidy has been given to the classified categories of the farmers during that period of the scheme, which is no more existing in the field of absolute impact of the scheme so created for the upliftment of the farmers and is a bigger worry to follow merits and demerits before any such work is taken in hand by the government in the interest of the welfare of the beneficiaries.