SECTION-4 OF THE RTI ACT ADJUDICATION MAY HELP IN ACCURACY OF DECISION MAKING, HOWEVER IT IS IMPORTANT TO IDENTIFY THE INFORMATION, THAT IS REQUIRED FROM THE SOURCE OF SUPPLY (PUBLIC AUTHORITY) .

RTI volunteers and activists believe in the fair working of transparency and accountability in administration and for which all the welfare groups and Associations of the RTI and the RTS act adjudication are continuously doing needful under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf, for which they are bound to follow Appeals before the FAA and SIC or CIC even compelled to approach the High courts in the interest of good governance and charter of public accountability. As such the government is bound to follow voice of the agitating RTI volunteers and activists as well as the Resource persons doing needful for the welfare of public utility and demanding correctness, accuracy and timely action on the subject matter deliberation required to be respond under law code manual prefixed by the observed confirmation made by PIO and challenged by the applicant for their service , as facing wrong assessment and non compliance even section 4 of the RTI act adjudication clearly indicating for online supply of informations , so concluded by the public authorities in relation to the reports and returns of the departmental decision making. Accordingly it is important to identify the information that is often required, the sources and the frequency with which the information must be updated. Systematic decision making is only possible if the reports and returns are properly specified, they are obtained and sent as required from the office. As such section -4 of the RTI act is very much related with the proformae monitored by the each section of the administration working on the captioned subject of compilation of the reports/returns and must be computerised for easy compilation and retrieval however people are facing problems to obtain their genuine informations related to their demand under public utility and forced to apply under RTI act adjudication again and again, where as there is no reason to deny help required to identify problems and bottle-necks , even though the conclusion of the report and returns should be taken into account while preparing the next annual plan, so as required to take positive steps/measures to remove said problems noticed by the FAA and SIC or CIC and the bottle-necks , placed before the department by the RTI activists and volunteers doing needful under public utility and welfare of the individual or the demand under public utility.