Voters are too responsible to compare the working of work and conduct of all candidates demanding their votes for the election fate and trophy for the tenure where all are declaring themselves veteran leaders of the society and circle, however it is the duty and responsibilities of the voters to follow aim and objective of their decision and vote for the honest, intelligent, experienced, qualified and a social worker of the society and area demanding their vote for his success however it is also necessary to have introduction with the candidate for who the voters are interested to elect him for there representation. As such it is difficult to have meeting with the representatives after they have obtained their state of leadership or MP or MLA position in the Parliament or Vidhan Sabha where they remained busy with the work and conduct of the Assembly or Parliament however it is also necessary to verify the report card of the existing MLAs and MPs before they are voted for the next time for which all the sitting MLAs and MPs are responsible to highlight their report card before the public of area and constituency and the voters are too responsible to ask for their quality performance of stature even while in the opposition where they must oppose the wrong doings of the ruling party in semblance to the requirements for people of constituency, demanding their rights and benefits from the power platform however facing unnecessary delay and dereliction of duty at every level of the public authority where people are generally facing corrupt practices of the department concerned and protecting their fundamental rights by way of the empowerment under RTI and the RTS act adjudication. So keeping in view the above position of tendency of the public authority the representatives have been declared responsibility to have discussion and arguments on the captioned subject of Annual reports of the RTI and the RTS but there is no practice to follow such merits of the vision RTI and the RTS act adjudication and people are unnecessary delayed by the government corridor in relation to their demand under public utility where there is no alternative except to fight for the right cause of demand under public utility and follow Appeals before the FAA and SICor CIC as the case may be. So keeping in view the above position of demand under public utility preferred by the general public in connection with their work for the day to day working, all the political parties are responsible to follow transparency and accountability in the administration first rather than to use their power platform for the interference on such democratic reforms against the government officials/officers and where the SIC may be held responsible to submit annual reports of each department as related to the work and conduct of the public information officers and may be penalised or declared responsible to face disciplinary proceedings where unnecessary delay and dereliction of duty verified by the Commission is proof and evidence on the record of the FAA and SIC .
.
No comments:
Post a Comment