PUBLIC AUTHORITIES AND THE SIC OR CIC COMPELLING THE APPLICANTS AND VOLUNTEERS TO FOLLOW HIGH COURT AND RELUCTANT TO DECIDE RTI APPLICATIONS AND APPEALS WITH IN THE PRESCRIPTION MADE AND EMPOWERMENT ISSUED FOR FACILITATION OF THE GOOD GOVERNANCE.

RIght to information is an Act of empowerment to the citizens of the country, particularly issued for the transparency and accountability in administration , however very few people are taking cognisance of the Act and information under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India, in this behalf even facing corruption in the day to day life of work and conduct of the

public authority, declared responsible for the maintenance of said Act however , Applicants, volunteers and the Resource persons too responsible to follow procedural compliance of the act and advice and furnish RTI application, First Appeal and the Second Appeal before the State information commission or the Central information commission, as the case may be. As for the First appeal is concerned it is decided by the higher office of the public authority, responsible for the delay, dereliction of duty and wrong assessment of case or misleading information by the public information officers, entirely responsible for the whole responsibility and punished under section 18 to 20 of the RTI act adjudication in case of delay and dereliction of duty etc etc. The state of Himachal pradesh also providing Right to public service Act facilitation through the State information commission working at Shimla for the needful under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf. So keeping in view the above empowerment for RTI and the charter of public accountability the citizens of country and the states must use their exercise for the good governance and accountability and follow the wrong deal of cases and correctness of information related to their day to day use and work and conduct of the public authority, responsible for the good governance and accountability , as deputed for the maintenance of Act and adjudication for the welfare of society and circle at every level of the demand under public utility, however it is the duty and responsibility of the applicant to follow procedural compliance of the case file and initiate proceedings under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf, Ultimately if not satisfied with the work and conduct of the government machinery applicant may follow High Court for their judicial service and contempt of court against the public authority, responsible for the correct information and complete reply with in law of the limitations, where penalty and disciplinary action may be initiated by the SIC or CIC, as the case may be.