GRADE SENIORITY IS A SEPARATE IDENTIFICATION OF THE POST AND POSITION AND THERE IS NO CHALLENGE OF ANY REDUCTION OF GRADE PERMITTED UNDER RULE 10(5) (C) OF THE CCS &(CC&A) RULES, 1965 , ALLOWING RANK SENIORITY OF THE POST TO CLAIMANT, IN SEMBLANCE TO THE POSITION OF OTHERS, WORKING IN THE JOINT CADRES OF SENIORITY FOR THE ENTIRE SERVICE BENEFITS.

Regulation of seniority through grade performance is a separate identification of post and position of the classification, so issued for the semblance of post confirmation under provision of the Rank seniority where qualifications of the post considered first rather than the entry for others in the joint cadre and junior in qualifications and the appointment issued for the individual concerned and in case of any dispute of seniority the department of the DOPT has been considered final for review and revision of such cases of the grade promotion and regularisation of seniority for the future performance and promotion of cadre /grade /post in position demanding regularisation of seniority in the prescribed grade of the higher /highest position and placement claimed under joint seniority for the others being junior in rank and grades than senior in qualifications and appointments issued for the entitlement of the first appointment and further roster in the second channel of promotion where no dispute could be raised by the others working in the former position and seniority of the post for promotion, instead of the placement for observation under law code manual prefixed by the recruitment and promotion rules in this behalf. It is particularly mentioned here that the rank seniority is a separate identity of the post and placement and there is no dispute of original seniority of the senior government employee working on the captioned subject of placement seniority and claimed under the provision made by second channel of promotion issued since department of personnel and training memo number dated 3-12-14, 1-9-2010 and 24-12-1981 however related cases of the Junior Engineers of the department of HPPWD yet pending for revision even pay commission report issued on 3-1-2022 is proof and evidence and department of HPPWD declared responsible to submit cases of the such posts of higher grade to department of Finance, if any clarification is required for the opinion on the regularisation of seniority of grade issued to junior Engineer after 18 years of regular service in the scale and grade on 3-10-1991 for which no dispute could be raised by the others concerned who gave not taken cognisance of the rank seniority provided by the rule 10(5) (c) of CCS &CC&A rules 1965 and given under the provision of Appeal against penalty of reduction in grade to the lower post instead of higher post, which has been allowed to perform duty under preference and option of the cadre in stagnation for single promotion however the junior cadres too promoted for the second and third time of the regularisation of seniority of post is a matter of wrong interpretation of law by the department of HPPWD which has been challenged by the advisory departments like Finance, DOPT, law and the administrative reforms however such cases are yet pending for due benefits with the HPPWD even pay commission report issued for clarification and department of HPPWD is responsible to take pending issue and matter with HP Finance , if any more clarification is required in the case file after pay commission report so issued on 3-1-2022 is proof and evidence on the record of all concerned :-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Phone number 9459334377