HPPWD FAILED TO PROVIDE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF PROMOTIONAL PLACEMENT TO JUNIOR ENGINEER, EVEN AFTER 18 YEARS OF REGULAR SERVICE WITH DESIGNATED POST EXTRA ASSISTANT ENGINEER, AND NOW IGNORING THE PAY COMMISSION REPORT, WEF (3-1-2022) .

State government of Himachal pradesh failed to provide ring of the constitutional protection required for the benefits of the senior most classification of posts issued to junior Engineers after 18 years of regular service in the scale and grade, even though the advisory departments are continuously favouring this addition made in favor of the deep long prevailed stagnation of post held by the placement delivered for the recovery of the promotional avenue but the DDOs are taking no cognisance of the instructions issued by department of Finance and the Personnel and unnecessary delaying the orders of the competent authority and the court of law protecting this ring of the constitutional protection assured under rule 6 of rules 1998 of the Assured Career progression scheme. Further it is submitted in the matter that honourable the Chief Minister and the PWD Minister has issued number of directions to the DDOs for comply with the orders in real sense of the positive measures to issue due FR-22 so delayed by the DDOs however neither the courts orders are followed by the DDOs nor the instructions of the department of Finance and the Personnel are adopted for the required benefits and the said posts are illegally ignored for the duty and responsibility of the addition made by the department of Finance and the Personnel, responsible for the due decision and conclusion in this behalf since the bifurcation made for the cadre seniority of senior grade in semblance to the position of others getting benefits of the promotional posts , even junior in the classification and qualification for which wrong assessment of the cadre seniority posts must have due benefits of the constitutional protection and decision taken by the Rule 10(5) (c) of CCS &CC&A Rules 1965 however the Department of HPPWD taking no course of action even pay commission report memo dated 3-1-2022 is very clear on the captioned subject of demand under ring protection of the Constitution since allowed for option and preference of this eligibility to have promotional level placement for the due benefits and the letter of modification too issued for the future course of action, under rule 6of rules 1998 of ACPS since 21-5-2004 by the Secretary of the department but said material placed on the record ignored for the reexamine is proof and evidence which has been verified by the honourable High Court on 25-10-2011 however yet there is no required correction by the DDO and the wrong interpretation of the law continued even direction by the HPAT orders too placed on record, so issued vide number OA 2073/01 dated 18-10-2006 and OA 3207/2006 however CWP(T) 15857/2008 ignored for taking positive steps by the Head of the department for which no correction at this stage of the pay commission report is undue harassment of the employee representing under rule 29(2) of CCA -1965 for revision of the pending case :-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD -3552 Bilaspur Himachal pradesh, Phone number 9459334377