HPPWD FAILED TO PROVIDE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF PROMOTIONAL PLACEMENT TO JUNIOR ENGINEER, EVEN AFTER 18 YEARS OF REGULAR SERVICE WITH DESIGNATED POST EXTRA ASSISTANT ENGINEER, AND NOW IGNORING THE PAY COMMISSION REPORT, WEF (3-1-2022) .

State government of Himachal pradesh failed to provide ring of the constitutional protection required for the benefits of the senior most classification of posts issued to junior Engineers after 18 years of regular service in the scale and grade, even though the advisory departments are continuously favouring this addition made in favor of the deep long prevailed stagnation of post held by the placement delivered for the recovery of the promotional avenue but the DDOs are taking no cognisance of the instructions issued by department of Finance and the Personnel and unnecessary delaying the orders of the competent authority and the court of law protecting this ring of the constitutional protection assured under rule 6 of rules 1998 of the Assured Career progression scheme. Further it is submitted in the matter that honourable the Chief Minister and the PWD Minister has issued number of directions to the DDOs for comply with the orders in real sense of the positive measures to issue due FR-22 so delayed by the DDOs however neither the courts orders are followed by the DDOs nor the instructions of the department of Finance and the Personnel are adopted for the required benefits and the said posts are illegally ignored for the duty and responsibility of the addition made by the department of Finance and the Personnel, responsible for the due decision and conclusion in this behalf since the bifurcation made for the cadre seniority of senior grade in semblance to the position of others getting benefits of the promotional posts , even junior in the classification and qualification for which wrong assessment of the cadre seniority posts must have due benefits of the constitutional protection and decision taken by the Rule 10(5) (c) of CCS &CC&A Rules 1965 however the Department of HPPWD taking no course of action even pay commission report memo dated 3-1-2022 is very clear on the captioned subject of demand under ring protection of the Constitution since allowed for option and preference of this eligibility to have promotional level placement for the due benefits and the letter of modification too issued for the future course of action, under rule 6of rules 1998 of ACPS since 21-5-2004 by the Secretary of the department but said material placed on the record ignored for the reexamine is proof and evidence which has been verified by the honourable High Court on 25-10-2011 however yet there is no required correction by the DDO and the wrong interpretation of the law continued even direction by the HPAT orders too placed on record, so issued vide number OA 2073/01 dated 18-10-2006 and OA 3207/2006 however CWP(T) 15857/2008 ignored for taking positive steps by the Head of the department for which no correction at this stage of the pay commission report is undue harassment of the employee representing under rule 29(2) of CCA -1965 for revision of the pending case :-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD -3552 Bilaspur Himachal pradesh, Phone number 9459334377

DDOs OF THE PWD AND I&PH DEPARTMENT ARE RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PAY COMMISSION REPORT ISSUED BY THE HP FINANCE ON 3-1-2022 AND ALLOW THEIR DUE ACPS , STOPPED/ WITH HELD DUE TO PENALTY OR OTHER WISE SINCE , 3-10-1991 ONWARDS

It is a matter of fact and concern that various schemes and objectives are given to the central and state government employees for their pay enhancement ,revision ,promotional avenues and the progression schemes  related to their R&P rules and Acts described by the study of protocol mentioned in the explanation of the department of the personnel and training for which benefits of increment, promotion, scale revision etc etc are awarded to the senior government employees by the government to protect their fundamental rights of the eligibility criteria in semblance to the position and situation of the due promotion policy of the government employees .It is a matter of fact and concern that the cadre of junior Engineer has been awarded with designated post Extra Assistant Engineer since 3-10-91 after completing 18 years of regular service in the scale and grade of junior Engineer for which benefits of promotional level placement given to post on option to protect the promotional avenues of cadre / grade / post in view to have long deep prevailed stagnation in the post but it is regretted to point the wrong interpretation of due ACPS by the DDOs even clear vision and provision made and created for the bifurcation of posts vide number :-- Fin - I - C(14) -1/83 dated 4-4-97 is proof and evidence on the record for which DDOs are responsible to protect options of the senior government employees and do the needful however neither benefits of FR -22 released to the promotional level placement EAE and XEN preferred in second channel of promotion by the incumbent EAE preferring second channel of promotion since 3-10-91 nor stagnation increments issued to the senior government employees after 24 and 32 years of regular service which is clear injustice with the class of junior Engineer facing stagnation even after 32 years of regular service is proof and evidence on the record. Number of Complaints furnished before the competent higher authority for deciding the former cases of the post held and restructured on the grade of promotion by an individual concerned senior government employees for which the pay commission report issued on 3-01-2022 may be verified from where the issue and matter deliberation noticed vide number Fin-(PR) -B- (7) -1/2021 dated 3-1-2022 and it is mentioned in clear vision that increment of senior government employees should not have been stopped/ withheld by way of penalty or otherwise for which the DDOs are responsible to clear the pending cases of the senior government employees and report compliance to the HOD under law code manual prefixed by the government in this behalf being final authority to take cognizance of the such cases of the senior government employees and release due benefits which could not be ignored and deleted under classification of posts mentioned with the provision not to affect adverse vide number Fin -C-B (7) - 6/88  dated 28-7-84 however above issues are still pending with the Department of PWD , I&PH for which necessary compliance report should be furnished by the DDOs to HOD on the basis of past performance and options  restructured under rule-6 of Rules -1998 of the ACPS clarified vide number Fin -I -C (14) -1/83 dated 4-4-97 is proof and evidence on the record of all concerned