GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO USE PROCEDURE FOR CONSULTATION AND REDRESSAL OF THE GRIEVANCES, AS PENDENCY IS CREATED BY THE LACK OF ADVICE, CONCURRENCE, OPINION, PROVISION/INSTRUCTIONS AND THE POLITICAL WILL POWER.

Proper procedure required for consultation by the officers working in the office administration is not being followed by the higher level of the work and conduct list by way and virtue of which brief history and sequence of events could not be maintained at the appropriate level of advice, concurrence or opinion at the level of law code manual or the court for consideration and number of people are being harassed, where in it is not decided  as how to deal with the case file lying in the pendency where in, the FAA, SIC as well as the Tribunal and the High Courts are also deciding captioned subject matter deliberations on the basis of hints only and considering the OAs of the general public as a representation for the redressal of grievances. Clear views on the said issues are not given by the departments, even justification and alternative for the acceptance at government level for which the cases are kept pending by the Heads of the offices and no facts finding reports are submitted to the Government and the Heads of the departments. As such there is no justification of the departmental law officers, too responsible for the opinion on the such issues and matters where queries are being raised by the lower level officers however no officers took interest in the consultations with the advisory departments and pending cases are kept pending because of the non compliance and lapse occured at the end of the higher level of the government and the Heads of the department where in all important matters the cases should be brought to the notice of the Secretary of the Department before being referred to the advisory departments however no action is taken by the concerned departments as per procedure for consultation and people are being harassed without any reason of the delay and dereliction of duty, even clear directions of the Department of Administrative reforms are kept pending and no appropriate action is being taken in the pending issues required for removal of pendency of cases at Government level for which the political suggestions made in the representations are too ignored by the departments and no disciplinary action is being taken against the defaulters for which the political platform is also responsible to take necessary positive measures required for removal of pendency of cases failing which it is very difficult to remove pendency of the cases in every field of the demand under public utility and the procedure for consultation required for removal of pendency of cases.