PEOPLE ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE CERTAIN AMENDMENTS OF DATA PROTECTION LAW, RELATED TO THE PRIVACY UNDER SECTION 8(1) (j) AND GOVERNMENT MUST FOLLOW PUBLIC INTEREST, AT FIRST, UNDER LAW CODE MANUAL.

Laying of rules:-- (1) Every rule made by the Government of India, central government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each house of parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days, which may be comprised in one session, or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall there after have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be, so however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of any thing previously done under that rule. (2) Every rule made under this Act by a state government shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is notified, before the state legislature. (Repealed vide G. I., Ministry of law and justice, Act No 37 of 2023 , dated the 17th December, 2023.) ---Power to remove difficulties-- (1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this effect Act, the Central government may, by order published in the official Gazette, make such provisions not in consistent with the provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary, or expedient for removal of the difficulty:Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of two years from the date of the commencement of this Act. (2) Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it is made, be laid before each House of Parliament:--- Repeal --- The Freedom of information Act, 2002 is hereby repealed. As for as exemption from disclose of information is concerned and related to Section 8(1) (j) is concerned, information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationships to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individuals unless the Central public information officer or the state public information officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be , is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information:provided that the information which can not be denied to the parliament or a state legislature shall not be denied to any person. " As such people are not satisfied with the amendments made under this provision of the exemption from disclosure of information enforced in the 8(1) (j) and facing problems in the various genuine concerns of the required informations with in the public domain denied to the general public and for which the opposition parties are also taking cognisance of the enforced denial in favor of the people demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance and required for removal of corruption from the government corridor, however the Government is taking no cognisance of the demand under public service and if it is not protected in favor of the general public people may not get justice from the RTI Act, 2005 , so empowered to the citizens of country for transparency and accountability in the administration and which could not be denied to the citizens as can not be denied to the parliament or a State Legislature, should not be denied to any person, in public interest:-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD 3552 Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number 9459334377