LAW PLAYS A FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN SHAPING FINDINGS OF THE RTI AND THE RTS ESTABLISHING JUSTICE FOR THE COMMON MAN HOWEVER AWARENESS GENERATION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MUST HAVE OVERALL SUPERVISION AT EVERY LEVEL OF THE PROCEEDINGS BY APPLICANTS, IF UNDERTAKING SIMPLIFICATION

The RTI and the RTS Act adjudication definitely playing an important fundamental role in shaping the transparency and accountability establishing justice and order required for the society and circle adopting the findings taken from the FAA and SIC or CIC as the case may be, evolving the norms and driving progress through the legal reforms presented for the correct and accurate solution of the information under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India, in this behalf, however the intersection of law and technology, Artificial intelligence, privacy and ethics is becoming a crucial area of contemporary relevance, where in integration of Artificial intelligence raising concerns about the data protection law and demanding a regular frame work as well as the assured transparency and accountability from the government corridor, required for the safeguarding of fundamental rights that may balance innovation with individuals liberties and recognising changes in our society and circle driven by the technology and evolving social norms too required for the changes of our difficulties being faced by the individuals or the society and circle, however there is no timely action and correction assured by the Act adjudication in this behalf. As such it is necessary to follow helplines , answering quarries of the general public and follow training programmes conducted by the various groups and societies taking cognisant of the demand under public utility and arranging for the awareness generation workshops and trainings for promotion of the use and exercise of empowering system delivered by the Government in favor of the citizens of country facing problems because of the required helplines and answer of quarries raised by the non compliance and wrong assessment of cases processed before the FAA and SIC or CIC as the case may be.