APPELLATE AUTHORITIES ARE TAKING NO COGNISANCE OF THE RTI DELIVERY, UNDER SECTION 19(6) OF THE RTI ACT, 2005 AND IN CONTRARY CREATING DISPARITY FOR THE SUPPLY OF INFORMATION, EVEN AFTER 45 DAYS.

Now a days all state governments and the Government of India doing unplanned expenditure on the development of public infrastructures, where there is no transparency and accountability and interest of the public representatives made accessible to demand under public utility, even though there is no provision for the all in the necessitated necessity of the demand under public service for which the work is approved right from Panchayat level to the Parliament level of the decision making on this standard of the political arena and security for the future welfare of the public, demanding free and fair justice from the system of Governance, even though and more over RTI applications are not observed in the positive directions of the demand under public utility and decisions are taken without any considerations of the benefits for all in the demand under public utility. On the other hand the Section 19(6) of the Right to information Act, 2005 clearly stating that, deciding appeals under the RTI Act is a quasi judicial function. It is therefore necessary that appellate authority should see to it that the justice is not only done, but it should also to appear have been done. In order to do so, the order passed by the appellate authority should be a speaking order giving justification for the decision arrived at.Further more if an appellate authority comes to a conclusion that the appellant should be supplied information in addition to what has been supplied to him by the PIO, he may either (1) pass an order directing the PIO to give such information to the appellant;or (2) he himself may give information to the appellant while disposing of the appeal. In the first case, the appellate authority should ensure that the information ordered by him to be supplied is supplied to the appellant immediately. It would however be better, if the appellate authority chooses the second course of action and he himself furnishes the information along with the order passed by him in the matter. It is particularly mentioned here that the PIO and the FAA, generally creating disparity on the captioned subject of demand under public service and taking no cognisance of the justice for mechanism of the information processed for good governance and accountability by the applicants, volunteers and the Resource persons working for the benefit of all in the society and circle, where disparity may be verified at any level of the decision and conclusion by the FAA however the Commissions are also working on the same standard of the disparity and accountability:--- Er Fateh Chand Guleria, RTI welfare Association, registered number HPCD, 3552 Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number 9459334377 .