GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE TO DECIDE FORMER CASES OF ACPS, AND REMOVE PENDING CASES OF VICTIMISATION, IN THE LIGHT OF RULE, 11CCS &CC&A RULES, 1965 , ACCEPTING CLASSIFICATION OF SENIOR POST AND GRADE, EXTRA ASSISTANT ENGINEER, INSTEAD OF PENALTY

Penalty doesn't amount to a penalty within the meanings of Rule, 11 CCS&CC&A Rules, 1965 and now the pay commission report issued by the department of Himachal pradesh Finance on 3-1-2022 has clearly mentioned that increments of the senior Government employees should have not been stopped/withheld by way of penalty or other wise and the option of the employees would be considered final and irrevocable one but the department of HPPWD taking no cognisance of the above decision making of the advisory department even number of letters issued for the necessary under rule obligation to department of the public Works but the department taking no cognisance of the instructions for final review and revision of former cases of ACPS even though and more over department of Administrative reforms and the DOP&T also relating issue and matter with promotion of the said post with second channel of the promotion of an employee, one who has preferred second channel of promotion since 1-11-1992 prior to 1-1-1996 but the public works department unnecessary creating hurdles to issue due FR-22 in favor of the senior Government employee designated with higher post and grade of Extra Assistant Engineer, wef, 3-10-1991 prior to 1-1-1996 for which the Honourable Central Information Commission has also issued decision on 3-6-2025 to issue clear information on the captioned subject of wrong assessment and adverse affects of an illegal penalty against the functional post issued to junior Engineer after 18 years of the regular service but the department of HPPWD taking no cognisance of the said decision making relating to the wrong assessment and adverse affects, even clear vision of the classification of post and decision of the Honourable High Court of Himachal pradesh to Head of the department issued vide CWP(T) 15857 /2008 dated 25-5-2011 directing the department to follow positive steps and decide matter of due benefits of dynamic ACPS within a period of four months, however there is no correction and rectification in wrong deal of case and the department unnecessary delaying review and revision of the ACPS where no claim of the Junior Engineer working at the post could be considered for second channel of promotion, keeping in view the option and preference of an employee and wrong assessment of case by disciplinary authority, one who has ignored letter of modification issued under rule 10(5) (c) of CCS &CC&A rules, 1965 , and related to the performance of the said post of Extra Assistant Engineer which is still kept pending for unnecessary victimisation, even promotional avenues issued to the junior cadre of drafts man during the period of 1-1-1986 to 1-1-1996 is proof and evidence but the department still ignoring second channel of promotion issued to the post of senior grade and qualifications in semblance to the others working on the said posts of promotion for junior Engineers however empowered to the junior in appointment for the post and the HP Finance and Personnel as well as Administrative reforms department compelling the department of HPPWD to do needful or send case file on the official file of proceedings for decision-making as related to the Assured Career Progression Scheme and there is no wrong to opt and prefer for the second channel, as junior Engineer appointed had been retired as junior Engineer, due to bunching affect of the cadre in deep and long stagnation, too responsible to opt their choice for future course of action under provision made and created for the removal of stagnation by Grant in ACP referred vide number PW-SE- 10 TH -VIG -FC Guleria /2017-18-5426-28 dated 29-9-2021 to the HOD and further referred to the Government vide HOD number 5945-46 dated 25-10-2021 is proof:-- Er Fateh Chand Guleria phone number 9459334377,Bilaspur Himachal pradesh