SIC AND THE CIC MUST TAKE SUO MOTU OF THE ANNUAL REPORTS AND FOLLOW THE RESULTANT UNDER LAW CODE MANUAL PREFIXED BY THE ACTION PLAN REQUIRED FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RTI AND THE RTS

The on going efforts made by the various groups and organisations as well as societies working for the good governance and accountability since empowerment and responsibility delivered by the constitution of India under article 19 (1) and 2 of the constitution of India have started initiating the move of charter of public accountability and transparency and accountability in the administration other than the work and conduct of the Public authorities working for the welfare of society and circle and too reporting the appropriate government for taking cognizance of the held deliberation noticed by the study of impact assessment realised by the government machinery and reforms however the preface issued under law code manual of the RTI act adjudication and too by the study of protocol mentioned in the public service guarantee act 2011 has taken no cognizance as required to be reported by the SIC and too by the CIC under the provision made by RTI and also to conclude the version and opinion of the above mentioned institutions in favor of the appropriate government whether the Public authorities are doing better contribution to resolve the Public grievances and what more is necessary to follow the instructions of the RTI act publications and too by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTS required for the welfare of society and circle more , so that people may take benefit of the charter of public accountability and transparency in the administration .The online digital programming and schedule for observation noticed by the study of protocol mentioned in the various meetings of the schedule for speedy justice and transparency in the Administrative reforms has highlighted the matter expedited for the promotion of RTI act publications however the social audit report at the level of the SIC and CIC still awaited even RTI informations too demanded from the system of governance and services maintained by the Registrar of the SIC for which the honourable Commission must take suo motu cognizance annually and do the needful as laid by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTI act publications and too by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTS act adjudication being responsible to report the facts findings under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India to appropriate government and discuss the matter in the house for Administrative reforms for which time to time reports have too been made to the department of the Administrative reforms and the Registrar of the SIC however nothing concrete has been done so for in the matter for which the sure progress and servival of the action plan under section 18 to 20 of the RTI act publications and too by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTS is proof and evidence if ignorance of law continued and no efforts made for the welfare of society and circle as demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance and facing the problems of corruption in the system of governance.