RELIEF SOUGHT UNDER RTI ACT ADJUDICATION MUST BE FOLLOWED BY THE FAA AND THE SIC UNDER LAW CODE MANUAL PREFIXED BY THE RTS WORKING FOR THE WELFARE OF COMMON MAN DEMANDING FREE AND FAIR JUSTICE FROM THE SYSTEM FOR SERVICE

No doubt that some of the RTI activists working for the welfare of society and circle and taking cognizance of the further proceedings laid down under the law code manual of description made by the FAA and SIC or CIC have proven most effective in their Appeals and Complaints before the appellate authorities however the FAA and SIC or CIC have started endless adjudication in the subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of protocol mentioned in their decision and compliance for the further proceedings to be laid down under the provision of Public service guarantee act 2011 by way and virtue of which the RTI activists are suffering a lot due to required review and revision of the cases a fresh as per the schedule under law code manual prefixed by the RTS in this behalf being too responsible to protect the fundamental rights of the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance As such the Complaints and representations of the RTI activists must be verified by the Public service guarantee act 2011 instead of wrong interpretation of the RTI act publications for which the Public authorities are too responsible to follow the RTS and decide such cases of the Applicants Accordingly in the interest of justice and transparency in the administration for which the endless observations must be put to an end by the responsible officers of the department as well as the Designated officers declared responsible to deal with the cases of the RTS publications for which the government of state must issue necessary directions to the all Public authorities regarding to verify the facts and figures of the old cases of the RTI act adjudication and follow fresh opinion and vision on the captioned subject matter deliberation noticed under the provision of RTS act adjudication for which the responsibility too exists with the same Office and authoritiy and there is no reason and logic to pend the former cases of RTI where the Applicants had already demanded relief from the system of governance and accountability before the FAA and SIC however such cases not considered under the purview of the RTS act adjudication for which the government and the DOPT as well as the Administrative reforms must play a key role to put an end of the such held memoranda placed on the record of the department and the government responsible to deal with the provision under law code manual prefixed by the study of impact assessment realised by the conclusions of the Public service guarantee act 2011 particularly issued for the welfare of society and circle and to decide the pending cases where Complaints and representations of the Applicants existing for the review and re-examine of cases as such the RTS has been declared as the time bound Act of the process and procedure laid down by the description made under law code manual and there is no reason to pend such cases of the Applicants as provision of the penal action existing in the cases of the RTS applications referred by the government must have appropriate action at the end of the designated officer and the office on duty for appropriate action/order for communication to the all concerned , being responsible to reply the queries and observations of the Applicants