OFFICE STAFF WORKING FOR REGISTRATION OF THE SECOND APPEALS IN (SIC) SHIMLA CONSIDERING IT AS GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE AND REJECTING THE APPEALS FOR WHICH MATTER BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF CIC ON 15-01-2024 AT 11-30 AM.

Principles of natural justice has been denied to the applicants, RTI activists and volunteers by way of rejecting their Appeals at the level of State information Commission Himachal Pradesh. The matter was brought to the notice of the respective CIC Himachal Pradesh on 15-1-2024 however the State information Commissioner asked the dealing hand to explain her position as per complaint given before the CIC on 15-1-2024 . The dealing hand accepted that Appeals are considered as general correspondence in some cases and are rejected for hearing which is not correct and genuine under law code manual prefixed by the RTI and the RTS act adjudication. Format of Appeal under the provision made could not be denied for acceptance under the provision of the act ibid for which the office and authorities are responsible to streamline the system created for the welfare of citizens of country however the findings given by the FAA must be attached with the Second appeal before the Commission and there is no reason to deny the appeals made by the applicants for wrong interpretation of law, incomplete information, misleading information and the incorrect information. The argument given by the complainant (Er Fateh Chand Guleria) had been accepted by the Commission as well as the dealing hand concerned however the respective CIC did not accept any mistake on his behalf and directed the office staff to look into the matter and do the needful for which Assistant Registrar of the SIC was not available in the office and the CIC directed to wait for and sit out side the office for which no further comments were available from the office and it was only the way out to walk out from the further discussion. It was also brought to the notice of the CIC that people may agitate against such activities of the office and it is a harassment of the appellant one who is time and again filing the Appeals however office and authorities taking no cognisance of the required action under law even cases referred by the FAA to follow Second appeal before the Commission. The CIC has been requested to improve the system of registration of Appeals instead of considering the general correspondence instead of the Appeals and rejecting the format of Appeals instead of summoning the Public information officers and their reply on the captioned subject matter, failing which matter would be brought to the notice of the honourable Governor and the President of India as people facing undue torments because of the wrong deal of cases of Appeals and considering it general correspondence instead of the Second Appeals.