POSITION OF CONSTITUTION ABOUT THE FREEDOM AND EXPRESSION UNDER BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

Checks and balances should be part of the basic structure of the Constitution, however in general it could be seen that situations are making for the law without idea behind the basic features of the constitution of our country, where one may presume the idea of thinking about the documentary attention related to the opinion on the captioned subject of chapter of the constitutional position and article 19(1) of the Constitution of India providing the all citizens right to freedom of speech and expression, to assembly peacefully and without arms, to form associations and unions, to move freely through out the territory of India, to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India, and to practice any profession or to carry on any profession, trade or business. Clauses (2) to (6) of Article 19 , however provide for the operation of existing laws and empowers the state Government to make any law imposing reasonable restrictions in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India or public order or morality etc, on the exercise of these rights. The term "Law" as per article 13(3) of the Constitution includes any ordinance, order, bye -law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having the force of law . The constituent assembly which drew up the document, but one feature was never there in the original structure of the Constitution ie the chapter on the fundamental duties, it was inserted later on in 1976 as Article 51A and it lists 11 fundamental duties of the citizens of the country to balance their rights under Article 12-35 . In theory, fundamental duties should also be enforceable, but they seldom are. Definitely there is a question before the citizens of the country to balance their rights and remove the problem where only rights flow from the Constitution and not obligation? Can anyone have rights without responsibilities?