Showing posts with label Interpretation of law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Interpretation of law. Show all posts

PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY MUST OBSERVE THE COMPLETE CIRCLE OF ANNUAL REPORT OF CIC AND SHOULD PROVIDE JUSTICE TO THE DEMOCRACY FOR THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE AND TO THE PEOPLE INSTEAD OF IGNORANCE OF LAW AND ACT, PROVIDING EMPOWERMENT THROUGH THE DECISION-MAKING UNDER LAW PROCESSING BEFORE THE FAA AND SIC OR CIC, AS THE CASE MAY BE

The Committee on Subordinate Legislation scrutinises and reports to the House whether the powers to make regulations, rules, sub -rules, bye -laws etc conferred by the constitutional or delegated by any lawful authority are being properly exercised within such delegation. This Committee in particular considers whether the delegated legislation is in accordance with the general objects of the. Constitution of the Act in pursuant to which it is made ; whether it contains matter which in the opinion of the Committee should more approximately be dealt within an Act of legislature;whether it imposes any tax ; whether it directly or indirectly bars the jurisdiction of the Courts; etc etc. Keeping in view the above empowerment of the Committee on subordinate legislation the information Commissions, after the end of each year, are required to prepare the reports on the implementation of the provisions of the Act during that year. Each Ministry or Department is required, in relation to the public authorities within its jurisdiction, to collect and provide information to the concerned information Commission for preparation of the report. The report of the Commission, inter alia, contains following information in respect of the year to which the report relates-- (1) the number of requests made to each public authority (2) the number of decisions where applicants were not entitled to access to the documents pursuant to the requests, the provisions of the Act under which these decisions were made and the number of times such provisions were invoked. (3) particulars of any disciplinary action taken against any officer in respect of the administration of the Act (4) the amount of charges collected by each public authority under the Act, and (5) any facts which indicate an effort by the public authorities to administer and implement the spirit and intention of the Act. It is particularly mentioned here that the documentary evidences related to the fiduciary disclosure of the benefits of the common man kept pending and without observation required for the use under powers to make regulations conferred by the Constitution or delegated by the lawful authority and people are suffering without required information under the provision for which the administration and the Ministry must take appropriate action in the interest of justice to common man failing which it is not possible to get justice from the administration for which Courts and Commissions are also doing needful but facing delay and wrong interpretation of law code manual at the government corridor for which RTI activists and volunteers are also making efforts to have justice from the Administration and the Ministry concerned but taking no cognisance of the law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf for which our parliamentary democracy is ultimately responsible to follow action. :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number 9459334377