SIC MUST FOLLOW COMPLAINTS FURNISHED UNDER SECTION 18 TO 20 OF THE RTI ACT ADJUDICATION

One must live in the present,mind set tries to excavate  informations either from the past or offer delusions about the future.It may bring unawareness in the mind set of human being if one is not  experience hand in the observation pointed out for the required documents demanded under the provision of RTI act publications As such informations asked by the study of protocol mentioned in the vision of future must have appropriate design and scope of the state for service so that public authorities may issue necessary opinion on the captioned subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of impact assessment realised by the RTI activists in this behalf being living in the present and must work for the present to take benefit of the RTI act adjudication.The documents related to the past confirmations could not denied to the RTI activists or the Applicants however it is regretted to point the unnecessary denial of informations even though such informations could not be denied to the applicants and the informations are lying in the public records of the public authorities for which the SIC may take cognizance of the section 18 to 20 if Applicants are willing to file Complaints but it regretted to point that the SIC has not taken any cognizance in the such cases of Complaints which is highly objectionable matter of fact and concern as applicants feeling harassed due to delay in deciding the cases and submitted Complaints before the SIC however the SIC ignoring the law code manual of RTI act adjudication as described under section 18 to 20 of the RTI act adjudication by way and virtue of which the cases are lying pending with the PIO and the FAA as no required action proposed by the competent higher authority empowered to initiate the disciplinary action and penalty against the defaulters .