COMPLAINTS MUST BE CONSIDERED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIY TO FOLLOW TRANSPANCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY

The courts are delaying the cases submitted by the public due to various reasons for which no individual could be held responsible and at the same time it has become general practice of the practitioners to demand unreasonable  hearing from the judges by way and virtue of which the more and more delay in deciding the pending cases has been occurred for which the online programming and hearings for schedule of events before the court of law and rules have been demanded by the Society of fast track justice for the welfare of society and circle however no concrete decision has been taken by the various courts even routine direction issued for the online programming and digital platforms is proof and evidence on the record .On the other hand now a days the RTI applications are also lying pending before the FAA and SIC or CIC for necessary follow up under law code manual of the RTI act adjudication even though there is no problem to start with the provision of online programming and digital platforms in the case of online RTI hearings as people may get benefits of the documents required for the welfare of society and circle or individual concerned and may be produced before the competent higher authority for required Administrative reforms by way and virtue of which the competent higher authority may follow the law code manual of government instructions and decide the cases accordingly .The courts are also depending on the Admininistration to provide justice to the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance for which the Administrative Departments may also act and oblige the general public if satisfied under the provision of instructions time to time released in this behalf of the good governance and accountability act particularly issued and empowered with the provision made under law and rules and further furnished to use and exercise the RTI act publications for which there is no criticism however inspiration and the awareness drive required to argue the things before public authorities is necessary to protect the fundamental rights of the Citizens ,as the things are going wrong as for as the present scenario and position is concerned for which no one could be held responsible even though indiscrimination could be noticed in the democratic politics in the country in every field and circle of the justice and transparency for which the RTI act publications may help the people if stern action against the defaulters would be followed as laid under the provision of RTI act adjudication under section 18 to 20 of the RTI act publications but it is regretted for the undue delay and dereliction of duty at every level of the transpancy and accountability for which the government is only responsible to follow Complaints against the defaulters and act accordingly.