SICs MUST FOLLOW CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES LIKE COMPLAINTS UNDER SECTION 18 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE TO APPLICANTS

It is necessary for the public authorities working on the captioned subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of impact assessment realised by the RTI activists regarding to take suo motu cognisance of the controversial issues and follow the law code manual for which the SIC should also decide  cases of Complaints preferred under section 18 of the RTI act publications keeping in view the futile practice and use and exercise of the first appeal before the Departmental officers having no penal powers , As such the first Appeals are not taken seriously neither by the PIOs nor by the appellate authorities by way and virtue of which it has become very necessary for the SIC to take cognizance of the filed Complaints referred under section 18 by the Applicants to honourable Commission however the Commissions are too taking no serious view of the said Complaints, which is not genuine and justified under the provision made and created for the good governance and accountability .As such the state information Commissions must verify the facts placed on the record of the Registry and related to the Complaints instead of denial to work on the captioned subject matter deliberation and declared controversial by the section 18 of the RTI act adjudication as the penal powers only exists with the provision made under law code manual prefixed in the second appeal / Complaint required to be verified and monitored by the study of protocol mentioned in the RTI act publications described as in the section 18 to 20 of the RTI act publications.