GOVERNMENT SHOULD ACT LIKE MODEL EMPLOYER AND DECIDE CASES ACCORDINGLY.

Government should act like model employer it has been stated by the Punjab and Haryana High court in a decision taken that the state government is expected to act like a model employer .The said issue and matter decided by the court was related to the pensionary benefits of a widow and the government has withheld/stopped the benefits of the said widow forcing her to file the writ petition.The petitioner, among other things,was seeking the quashing of a communication denying her the benefits of the old pension scheme.Directions were also sought for quashing the order where by she was refused to be accommodated in employment on the compassionate basis .After hearing the rival contentions and going through the documents the court asserted that the petitioner a widow,had applied for pension inthe year 2008 after the demise of her husband same year .There was no reason to withhold the pensionary benefits payable to the petitioner  once the court had given a declaration that the identically situated multipurpose health worker (male) would be entitled to the pension under the system of old pension scheme. The court further stated in the matter and added that there was in fact no necessity for the petitioner to have filed a fresh application for the release of the pensionary amount as she had already filed an application earlier in the year 2008 .The observation came in context of the state counsel's arguments that the petitioner had already submitted the application again on September 2029 for the release of her pension under the old pension scheme and further stated that her husband was not a party to the litigation regarding the multipurpose health workers entitlements before the court and the state government is expected to be a model employer and should act accordingly. It is particularly mentioned here that the state governments are taking no cognizance in the such cases of isolated identification and the Introduction given by the government servants in favor of their respective promotional benefits as well as the placement issued by the ACPS to regular basis as getting no Promotion during their service career for which the number of cases are pending before the department concerned and people facing undue harassment by way of wrong interpretation of law code manual prefixed by the DDOs even though there is no reason to delete the monthly statement of cases pending finalisation over 3 months after clear vision and Reports and returns of the cases forwarded to the department concerned for speedy delivery and justice, more over the government is too resposible to follow law of limitations prefixed by the department of Administrative reforms organisation and do the needful instead of withholding the former cases of due benefits and releasing the newer ones which is highly objectionable matter of fact and concern to be look into the matter and follow disparity created by the government and the department concerned for which the Department of Personnel Administrative Reforms must issue deadlines on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be noticed by the monthly statement of cases pending finalisation over 3 months and processed under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India in this behalf.