GOVERNMENT SHOULD VERIFY THE FORMER CASES OF (ACPS ) AS KEPT PENDING FINALISATION OVER 3 MONTHS SINCE OBSERVANCE BY THE INSTRUCTIONS ISSUED FOR THE DUE COURSE OF ACTION UNDER LAW CODE MANUAL PREFIXED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL (ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS ORGANIZATION) .

Introduction of higher post and grade prefixed for the benefit of promotional levels placement has been issued to the posts after eighteen years of regular service in the scale and grade or first appointment to the cadre /grade /post declared eligible for the due promotion and next higher level of placement with second promotion to the cadre /grade /post which could not be denied to the existing incumbent if preferring for the due course of action plan given by the department and the state government being responsible to protect the fundamental rights of the cadre's eligibility and promotion up to the higher / highest (R&P) semblance give to the cadre / grade /post of junior Engineers however the state government has failed to protect the fundamental rights of the said post and still considering the illegal proceedings of the penalties denied by the law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India in this behalf since 28-7-1984 more over now the pay commission report is very clear on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be verified by the department of HPPWD where in it is clearly mentioned that the increments of the senior government employees should have not been stopped/withheld by way of penalties or otherwise and option would be considered final and irrevocable one .As such the department is responsible to follow monthly statement of cases pending finalisation over 3 months and submit the due facts finding report to the Department of Administrative reforms and the other concerned responsible to release the benefits of Introduction processed with Procedure before the competent higher authority for removel of such penalties mentioned as by the department of finance in the pay commission recommendations issued vide number Fin (PR) B -(7) -1/2021 dated 3-1-2022 however non compliance and wrong assessment of the cases have no required review and re-examine,afresh even clear directions of the Honourable Tribunal issued for the necessary follow up action under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India to protect the fundamental rights of the eligible officers bifurcated in the channels of Promotion since orders of the department of Finance,issued vide number Fin -I -C (14) -1/83 dated 4-4-97 and verified by the department of the Personnel to benefit as per the procedure laid vide number Per (AP-B) -B -l l -2/2004 -16 dated 3-12-2014,1-9-2010 however former cases of ACPS yet pending for finalisation even penalties denied for the action like reduction in grade and compulsory retirement in the order of the Rule 10 (5)(c) of CCS &CC&A rules 1965 is proof and evidence where in it is clearly mentioned that"In appeal or revision the order is modified into one other than dismissal removal or compulsory retirement and no further enquiry is order to be held " As Enquiries carry no meanings under law and rules if there exists empowerment under the provision made by the letter of modification which could not be denied for the due observance of the instructions issued by the government and Department of the Finance and the personnel being responsible to protect the fundamental rights of the cadre and qualifications in semblance to the promotions for others too getting benefits in the joint cadre of the higher /highest (R&P) entries given as per the schedule under Quota promotions to every cadre/grade /post and it is necessary to protect the fundamental rights of the promotions issued in lieu of the (R&P) amendments to junior Engineers after -18 years of regular service in the scale and grade prefixed at par with the first Promotion on 3-10-1991 by the department of Finance with designated post Extra Assistant Engineer and for which the next higher level of post and grade too issued with designated post of Extra Engineer ,which has yet no review and re-examine of case even High Court review and re-examine for benefits up to the possible extent is proof and evidence on the record of the all concerned,more over, penalty carry no meanings with in the terms of rule 11 CCS &CCA -1965 and the record must be verified by the disciplinary authority to furnish the monthly statement of cases pending finalisation over 3 months as lying pending before the competent higher authority since letter of modification issued on 21-5-2004 .