OWNERSHIP OF CONSTITUTION RELATED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC OF COUNTRY BUT IT IS DIFFICULT TO PROTECT THE MEANINGFUL RESULTS OF THE OWNERSHIP ASSURED BY THE LAW CODE MANUAL, PREFIXED BY THE CONSTITUTION

The political parties working for the democratic Republic of country had created a strong sense of ownership of the Constitution and the willingness to protect it and on the other hand it is going to becoming the duty of the general public to protect their eligibility requirements by how or means and there is no option except to struggle for the fundamental rights. Our research shows that the Indian public acted on the basis that it belonged to them for getting their rights protected under the provision made by law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf, but it is not truly doing needful and working for the welfare of general public, even it is mentioned that Constitution of our country working for the welfare of general public, however it is difficult to protect the fundamental rights without protests and widespread struggles, more so the people's movements are depending upon the representation of the area and circle and taking no review of the work and conduct of the demand under public service and utility for the required protection of their general rights and the meaningful resultant of the equity for the good governance and accountability, even RTI and the RTS act adjudication too require litigation and legislation for which the matter already protected under the provision of the law and rules but no action is taken by the administration, as per the decision making of the Courts of law for using the Constitution of India and doing needful as a measure of the positive thinking at every  corner of the life and liberty and recognising the adverse effects against the governmental policy and rules and regulations adopted for the general fundamental rights to the expanded design and scope of the realisation for use of practical regime for the good governance and accountability, where every citizen of the country has been considered equal and at par with each other in the policy making of impact on the factor of safety and accountability for the good governance and accountability and charter of public accountability, being a time bar right to equality , but the RTI and the RTS act adjudication also facing delayed response of the public information officers, First Appellate authorities and the SIC or CIC as the case may be :-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377