DDOs ARE RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PAY COMMISSION REPORT AND INTIMATE POSITION OF FORMER CASES RELATED TO PENALTY AND WRONG INTERPRETATION , NOTICED BY THE RESPECTIVE PAY COMMISSION ON 03-01-2022 .

REQUEST AND SUBMISSION BEFORE THE HIMACHAL PRADESH PAY COMMISSION:-- The pay commission report furnished on 3-10-91 by the government of Himachal Pradesh department of Finance considering the designated post Extra Assistant Engineer after eighteen years of regular service in the scale and grade of junior Engineer has been issued to the stagnated cadre for which the provision of option exists under rule 6 of rules 1998 of the ACPS and post was functional one how ever it has not been empowered to initiate the process of upgradation for which operation of the higher post and grade agreed by the HPAT to follow grade/class and release due FR -22 to cadre / post concerned in the interest of justice and transparency but the DDOs didn't follow the held review and revision of the post held and restructured under rule 6 of rules 1998 of the ACPS even Complaint before the Punjab pay commission and the HP Finance is proof and evidence on the record by way and virtue of which the department of personnel has also written to the department of Public Works to release due benefits of the Applicants as protected under rule 6 of rules 1998 but nothing concrete has been done by the controlling authority even letter of modification too issued under law code manual prefixed by rule 10 (5)(c) and rule 11 of CCS &CCA -1965 for which memo dated 21-5-2004 and 24-8-2010 too issued to the HOD by Secretary of the department to release the due benefits up to the possible extent but of the no use for which the matter was too brought to the kind notice of the Honourable HC of HP Shimla to follow held departmental proceedings of the competent higher authority and re-examine a fresh as such the penalty and Enquiry has been denied by the law and rules after issue of letter of modification (21-5-2004) but it is regretted to point the still wrong interpretation of law code manual by the DDOs till date and for which now the respective pay commission report has issued instructions to the all concerned regarding to consider the option of an employee as final and irrevocable one and it is too informed that increments of the senior government employees should not have been stopped and withheld by way of the penalty and otherwise for which now DDOs are held responsible to comply with the orders and instructions of the competent higher authority still ignored and deleted for the compliance under law code manual prefixed by the pay commission report since 3-10-91 even though and more over penalty does not amount to a penalty with in the meanings of law and rules however former cases are still lying pending with the department of HPPWD for releasing due benefits introduced vide number Fin -PR-B-(7) -51 /98 dated 16-8-2000 is proof and evidence on the record and there is no reason to ignore the decision of HP Finance and Personnel particularly issued to benefit the second channel of promotion with confirmation vide number Per -(AP-B) -B-ll -2/2004-16 dated 3-12-2014 is also proof and evidence on the record of HOD and other concerned .So keeping in view the wrong assessment and adverse effects against the classification of posts restructured by way of addition made under rule 6 of rules 1998 of the ACPS made necessary promotion adjudicated by the HP Finance and Personnel may be furnished and notified as per the schedule under observation respond vide number Fin -PR-B-(7) -51/98 dated 16-8-2000 or necessary advise may be conformed as laid vide number Fin -PR-B-(7) -1/2021 dated 3-1-2022.