DDOs ARE RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PAY COMMISSION REPORT AND INTIMATE POSITION OF FORMER CASES RELATED TO WITH HELD / STOPPED INCREMENTS .

Assured Career Progression Scheme has been issued to the senior government employees in lieu of stagnation in the cadre /grade / post held by an employee as such eight years of regular service has been prefixed as the criterion for first promotion of the employee for which the employee if stagnated may be awarded with stagnation increment after eight years of regular service .On the other hand the pay commission reports are revised for the enhancement of salary of the employee after 8/10 years of the regular interval .Earlier it was the practice to convert the existing scale of class/ post into revised one however due to deep long prevailed stagnation on the various groups and cadres / categories of the senior government employees now it has become difficult to issue conversation of the old scale into the new one for which the government has provided three options to follow and protect their salaries in the Punjab pay hike however the state government of Himachal Pradesh is reluctant to follow third option or fifteen percent hike in the emoluments for which the government has given only two alternatives to the employees for their right choice and option to be maintained for the future semblance ,as such the option shall be final and increment of the senior government employees should have not been withheld/ stopped due to penalty or otherwise for which it is clear that the pay commission report is also concerned to the removal of stagnation and issue promotional avenues to the senior most government employees tracking out without any promotion even having more than 32 years of the regular service in scale and grade of the post held for which the time to time review and revision of various groups and cadres of bunching have been identified by the DOPT and the necessary representation may be processed under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India before the pay commission if debarred from the 2/3 promotions and for which the benefits of 8/18 years of proficiency step up scheme had been granted to the junior Engineers since 3-10-1991 however issue and matter still pending for due benefit as per Introduction issued vide number Fin -PR -B-(7) -51/98 dated 16-8-2000 and for which the pay commission has clearly mentioned that increment of the senior government employees should not have been stopped/ withheld by way of penalty or otherwise and now it has become duty of the concerned department to review former cases of ACPS and release due benefits of the pay anomalies created because of the deep long prevailed stagnation in the cadre / grade / post held by the senior most government employee over due for promotional avenues and facing the bunching affect for which the DOPT has too suggested and asked for the welfare of such employees to follow clubbing of posts and function of the placement/ Promotion awarded for the cadre seniority posts at higher / highest promotional level placement and too protected under rule 6 of rules 1998 of the ACPS verified by the DOPT and HP Finance vide number Fin - PR - B (7) -51/ 98 dated 10-8-99 and 16-8-2000 is proof and evidence on the record how ever issues and matter wrongly interpretated by the DDOs .