DELAY IN DECIDING THE MATTERS PERTINENT TO RTI AND RTS ACT ADJUDICATION INCREASING UNNECESSARY EXPENSES OF THE APPLICANTS AND VOLUNTEERS RAISING THE COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE SYSTEM FOR SERVICE UNDER TRIAL REQUIRED TO BE NOTICED BY THE PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY OF THE COUNTRY.

It is a matter of fact and concern to be noticed by the RTI activists, volunteers and the Resource persons whether to invest in the findings of the RTI act publications and too the RTS act adjudication or not as such I have gone through a case filed by an Advocate before the court of law to have FIR against the defaulters for which the RTI application has been preferred by the said Advocate during 2007 .Under the provision made by the RTI act publications the application must be dealt with in a period of thirty days however such lengthy procedural and compliance of the RTI act publications definitely requires time and money to spent on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be maintained by the applicants or RTI activists and Volunteers at their own expenses and trust on the government observations collected time to time from the system of governance under law code manual prefixed by the RTI act publications and too by the RTS act adjudication and also by way of the complaints under article 350 of the constitution of India.As for as the question of the RTI is concerned the matter is clear under section 6(1) and 3 of the Act ibid however the RTS act adjudication cases are kept pending without any solid ground of the designated officer for which complaints are processed before the appellate authorities under article 350 of the constitution and the cases are delayed more and more even required to be accomplished with in the law of limitations prefixed by the government of state and the centre working for the welfare of society and circle and doing the needful under law code manual.Keeping in view the above prospectus of the work and conduct of the service rendered by the public authorities it is necessary to have online access to information so that delay and dereliction of duty may be avoided and timely action may be obtained from the system of governance and charter of public accountability as facing problems due to unusual practice of delay and dereliction of duty at the level of public authorities and there is no logic to invest on the such informations where the cases are referred further to the APIOs and the informations remained in the public domain due to required correspondence and accountability at the different levels of the department and the public authorities working under the control of the one Head of the Department even.