HOW TO PROTECT THE GOOD GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPARENCY IN ADMININISTRATION WITH THE EMPOWERMENT ISSUED FOR THE RTI AND RTS ACT ADJUDICATION.

The RTI act publications and the RTS act adjudication preferred by the applicants , Activists, Volunteers and the Resource persons under article 19(1) ,21 and 350 of the constitution of India must have appropriate vision ,action and correction at the level of competent higher authority being responsible to protect the fundamental rights of the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance however the disciplinary authorities are taking no cognizance of the instructions issued for the good governance and accountability for action against the government officials and officers working for the administrative reforms for which Complaints are being filed under the provision made and created for the welfare of society and circle so that people may get benefits of the RTI act publications and too the RTS act adjudication particularly issued by the government to remove corruption and bring transparency and accountability in the administration. Users are paying fees and charges prescribed by the government in contravention of the provisions of the RTI act publications and the RTS act adjudication which mandates all informations, rules,laws and the pertinent notifications to be verified and made available to the applicants, Activists Volunteers and the Resource persons making representation under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India in this behalf,as not satisfied with the information provided by the Public information officers and filing the complaints with in the provision made by Article 19 (1) ,21 and 350 of the constitution of India however no administrative reforms initiated by the disciplinary authority even clear vision and instructions of the DOPT and the administrative reforms organisation working for the welfare of people of country and states demanding their information and decision under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India in this behalf for which every applicant may have a right to demand the fair enquiry and investigation under article 21 of the constitution and the disciplinary authority is responsible to reply the basic concept of the format driven by the government for the submission of the monthly statement of cases pending finalisation for over 3 months as delay and dereliction of duty has been considered a serious offence of the conduct rules under law code manual and penalties may also be imposed with the recommendations of the disciplinary action against the defaulters.