DDOs ARE RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PAY COMMISSION REPORT AND INTIMATE POSITION OF FORMER CASES RELATED TO WITH HELD / STOPPED INCREMENTS .

Assured Career Progression Scheme has been issued to the senior government employees in lieu of stagnation in the cadre /grade / post held by an employee as such eight years of regular service has been prefixed as the criterion for first promotion of the employee for which the employee if stagnated may be awarded with stagnation increment after eight years of regular service .On the other hand the pay commission reports are revised for the enhancement of salary of the employee after 8/10 years of the regular interval .Earlier it was the practice to convert the existing scale of class/ post into revised one however due to deep long prevailed stagnation on the various groups and cadres / categories of the senior government employees now it has become difficult to issue conversation of the old scale into the new one for which the government has provided three options to follow and protect their salaries in the Punjab pay hike however the state government of Himachal Pradesh is reluctant to follow third option or fifteen percent hike in the emoluments for which the government has given only two alternatives to the employees for their right choice and option to be maintained for the future semblance ,as such the option shall be final and increment of the senior government employees should have not been withheld/ stopped due to penalty or otherwise for which it is clear that the pay commission report is also concerned to the removal of stagnation and issue promotional avenues to the senior most government employees tracking out without any promotion even having more than 32 years of the regular service in scale and grade of the post held for which the time to time review and revision of various groups and cadres of bunching have been identified by the DOPT and the necessary representation may be processed under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India before the pay commission if debarred from the 2/3 promotions and for which the benefits of 8/18 years of proficiency step up scheme had been granted to the junior Engineers since 3-10-1991 however issue and matter still pending for due benefit as per Introduction issued vide number Fin -PR -B-(7) -51/98 dated 16-8-2000 and for which the pay commission has clearly mentioned that increment of the senior government employees should not have been stopped/ withheld by way of penalty or otherwise and now it has become duty of the concerned department to review former cases of ACPS and release due benefits of the pay anomalies created because of the deep long prevailed stagnation in the cadre / grade / post held by the senior most government employee over due for promotional avenues and facing the bunching affect for which the DOPT has too suggested and asked for the welfare of such employees to follow clubbing of posts and function of the placement/ Promotion awarded for the cadre seniority posts at higher / highest promotional level placement and too protected under rule 6 of rules 1998 of the ACPS verified by the DOPT and HP Finance vide number Fin - PR - B (7) -51/ 98 dated 10-8-99 and 16-8-2000 is proof and evidence on the record how ever issues and matter wrongly interpretated by the DDOs .

EVERY CLASS OF EMPLOYEE MUST FURNISH THEIR PAY REVISION ANOMALIES BEFORE THE DOPT AND THE PAY COMMISSION TO VERIFY THE PAST AND FUTURE SEMBLANCE OF THE LAW CODE MANUAL PREFIXED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND PROVIDE JUSTICE TO THE CADRE / GRADE/ POST.

The pay commission report furnished by the state government of Himachal Pradesh must be re examined a fresh as per demand of the various employees Organisation .The said report has already been delayed by the pattern standard of Punjab State even declared to pay with effect from 1-1-2022  for which the government has released its review and revision issued vide number Fin (PR) -B(7) -1/2021 dated 3-1-2022 to have due option and opportunity for the grant under pay commission report for which various recommendations have been issued by the government to protect the fundamental rights of the senior government employees and the junior entrants joining the field of duty and responsibility under appointment and the promotion rules governed by the present recruitment and promotion rules of the each category .The pay commission report and it's recommendations are becoming irreliable due to benefits of the Assured Career Progression Scheme time to time revised by the government however some cadres are taking due benefits of the placements and the promotions up to the possible extent but number of cadres have been denied the genuine benefits of the placements and the promotional avenues due to stagnation and unproportional  grant and benefits of the Assured Career Progression Scheme kept pending since announcement of the 4-9-14 standard of due grant and benefits of the increased pay enhancement by way of increment and the promotional avenues so that every category and classification of posts may be awarded with the genuine benefits up to the possible extent even getting no promotion during the entire service career of 32 years is proof and evidence on the record in the case of junior Engineer one who has been eligible for the quota promotion prefixed up to the higher / highest level of the placement/ promotion for which no benefit has been given to the cadre existing in the pay revision since 3-10-91 is proof and evidence on the record. As such the stagnation existing in the various cadres / posts/ grades have created such anomalies in the pay revision for which more and more disparity could be seen in the various cadres/categories made for the classification released as per decision verified vide number Fin -C-B (7) - 9/78 -III dated 28-7-84 and anomaly adjudicated to release due pay enhancement vide number Fin-(PR) -B-(7) -1/2021 dated 3-1-2022 is proof and evidence on the record of the pay commission report submitted by the HP Finance in this behalf .The deep long prevailed stagnation in some of the cadres / categories have created such anomalies for which govt is responsible to protect the fundamental rights of the every cadre / category failing which it would be difficult to remove the existing anomalies for which the stagnation increments and pay enhancements could not be stopped / with held due to penalty or otherwise has been too recommended by the respective pay commission on 3-1-2022 by way and virtue of which the government is too responsible to follow future course of action plan in the interest of justice and transparency to protect the pay increase in favor of the cadre/ categories/ posts where the deep long prevailed stagnation has been observed by the pay commission Reports at various intervals of the time to time review and revision of pay parity and promotion avenues proposed by the (DOPT) and released by the HP Finance being responsible to protect the fundamental rights of each cadre / grade / post eligible for the 2/3 promotions during the course of entire service career .

EVERY CLASS OF EMPLOYEE MUST FURNISH THEIR PAY REVISION (ANOMALIES) BEFORE THE DOPT AND THE PAY COMMISSION ( HP FINANCE) TO VERIFY THE PAST AND FUTURE SEMBLANCE OF THE GRANT AND BENEFITS REQUIRED TO BE ADJUDGED UNDER LAW CODE MANUAL PREFIXED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

Freedom of speech and expression given to the citizens of country under article 19 (1) (a) of the constitution is the most important human right .The persons responsible for hate speech should be concerned about the wrong doings under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India instead of legal guarantee of the constitution related to the RTI act publications and too the RTS act adjudication for which people have been empowered to initiate their issues and matter before the appropriate government to protect their fundamental rights however what ever we take for granted in terms of the constitutional provisions under law and rules can never be taken for granted for which the Vigilance proceedings must be necessary on both ways required for the liberty enforced too by the courts and is the rule of law in the country required for the natural justice to deliver transpancy and accountability in the administration and removal of corruption from the system of governance for which the RTI and RTS act adjudication virtually issued to the citizens of country so that they may have opportunity to follow Article 19 (1)(a) of the constitution but it is unconstitutional to follow hate speech and ignore the basic concept of the empowerment delivered to the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance.

FORMER CASES OF THE ACPS EXISTING PRIOR TO 1-1-1996 MUST BE CONSIDERED AND DECIDED BY THE GOVT AS PER PROVISION MADE BY THE LAW CODE MANUAL FURNISHED ON 7-7-2014

A DETAIL NOTE OF ACPS DEMANDED BY THE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT:--The preference and option dealt  by the DOPT has been recognized in pertinent to the channel of promotion where no promotional avenue s are available to the candidate or applicant and it is a matter of pleasure to the stagnated  candidate as the work done has been recognized in pertinent to the line of promotion so preferred by the candidate or applicant being senior to the junior cadre getting promotions in the joint cadre the observation and findings given in this behalf by the FAA at Head office  and the decision and orders passed by the SIC is truly a moving moment of the ACPS by way and virtue of the which work done has been recognized in the capacity of operation and  information highlighted by the candidate or applicant being eligible to act and officiate for which finalization of the department of HP finance already concluded on 7-7-2014 is  assured for the held revision  of introduced ACPS  and now the final review is reported at the level of the  HOD   It is also  adjudged and consented with the provision under CCS&CCA Rule -1965 that in appeal or in the revision  order could be modified in favour of the applicant or candidate but due to wrong interpretation of rules the disciplinary  authority did not follow the application even clear order issued on 21-5-2004 is proof for which now the matter was again heard  by disciplinary authority on 30-8-18 and asked for the clarification from higher office from where necessary clarification issued on 1-11-18 in which it has been mentioned that order issued on 21-5-2004 by the  Secretary PWD is confirmation of the higher authority and further action was required in case file  at your end So in accordingly the detailed note of preferred ACPS has been demanded by the HOD to take notice of the held departmental proceedings as well as the orders of the HPAT and the High Courts of HP Shimla for which applicant have too furnished e samadhan  application numbers PWD/20192791,2792and 2793 to clear the position of pending case file  and feeling satisfied with the proceedings under RTI initiated with the findings by PIO cum Sectional officer PWD-(A) on 23 -7-2019 with the comments that subject matter pertains to the O/o ENC, HPPWD Shimla and further action is taken by the ENC ,HPPWD Shimla In this connection it is particularly mentioned that the department of HP Fin and HP Per are the final authority to review and revise the cases of ACPS but the HPPWD authority have never asked for any advise and the wrong assessment and adverse affects yet enforced and continued even date of superannuation of applicant or candidate is 30-4-2014 however still demanding the benefits of ACPS introduced by the HP finance on 3-10-91 and revised with due FR-22 on 16-8-2000 and finally concluded for removal of anomalies on 7-7-2014