GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT IGNORE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND ENTITLEMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES DECLARED VALID UNDER LAW AND

India is a democratic reforms country and it is necessary for every citizen of the country to know the system generated for statutes of the free India working for the every citizen of country under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India in this behalf .The primary law that governs management and administration of the system maintained by the public authorities should be protected by the manual of description made for the good governance and accountability however it is regretted to point that the Public authorities are not taking cognizance of the legal course of action and reformation or rehabilitation where Complaints under article 350 of the constitution of India remaining unchanged since the decision of the higher authority and too verified by the court of law in this behalf of the due eligibility and criterion for the performance made and created for the administrative reforms being responsible to protect the fundamental rights of each and every citizen demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance and for which the RTI act publications and too the RTS act adjudication protecting the status of given law and rules however the department concerned are taking no cognizance in the matter even clear vision and correction of the higher office and authority for which penal action against the defaulters must be brought to the notice of the HOD but the HODs are taking no cognizance of the such administrative reforms even though matter too highlighted by the department of Administrative reforms organisation to deal with the provision for due benefits instead of wrong interpretation of the law code manual but no comprehensive reexamination of the system for service and reply to the amendment made and created for the removal of wrong assessment of cases pending finalisation over 3 months and submitted before the competent higher authority taken under law code manual prefixed by the relevant opinion and orders by the Department of Personnel Administrative Reforms taken by the Head of the office from where unconstitutional penalties enforced against the fundamental rights of the classification of posts based on the qualified seniority by way of senior in qualifications and grades which act of the such office and authority must be taken seriously in the light of ignorance of law pointed by the Tribunal and too by the SIC and High court's of Himachal Pradesh to re-examine the case files and do the needful under law code manual prefixed by the provision made and created for the recovery of fulfilling the constitutional promises required to eliminate the disparity created with the senior in rank and grades who must be promoted with the equation of reforms under law code manual approved by the Constitution of India since rehabilitation issued for the recovery vide number Per (AP -B) -B-(11) -2/2004-16 dated 3-12-14, first September 2009 and 28-7-1984 however wrong interpretation of law yet enforced by the Head of office for which government has taken no cognizance even case file overdue since the pay commission recommendations issued by the department of HP Finance vide number Fin - (PR) -B-(7) -51/98 dated 16-8-2000 ,7-7-2014 and 3-1-2022 with clear vision and correction to follow the instructions of the department of Personnel and not to withheld/ stop the increments of the senior government employees and to follow the options placed on the service records of the such officers /officials claiming their seniority on the bases of the fundamental rights required to promote equally in the line of promotion under Quota reserved first for the qualifications insted of the caste system generated after the legal validity it's requirements to the community people working in the line of promotion and given by the government in the second channels of Promotion to follow stagnation and preference under the provision made to act on the higher /highest plateform of the placement issued to the cadre / grade /post for probational confirmation and maintenance of the status so issued by law under rule 10(5)(c) of the CCS&CC&A rules  -1965 issued the Secretary of the department vide number PBW -A-B (13) -37/95 dated 21-5-2004 and too varified vide number PW -CE -MZ ES-1 - 11743 dated 1-1-2018 addressed to Head of the office by the department to deal with accordingly however no concrete action taken in the matter even order of original penalty amended to rule 11 from rule 12 of the CCS&CC&A Rules -1965 by said Head of the office and fully responsible to accept the mistake ,however the government has failed to follow the instructions of the department of Administrative reforms organisation and the Finance as well as the DOPT is a matter of fact and concern for which the honourable Chief Minister has also demanded a facts finding report to comment on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be verified under law as laid by the OA number 2073/06 since the long however issue and matter still pending is a matter of sore grave concern.