GAD IS RESPONSIBLE TO NOTIFY DESIGNATED PIO AND THE FAA.

DEGRADATION OF THE RTI ACT 2005 BY WAY OF THE BELOW STANDARD APPOINTMENTS OF THE PIO AND FAA IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE  DUTY AS WELL AS THE REFORMS :-- In many states no notification has been issued by the  government to clarify the status and standard of the appointments for the posts of PIO and the FAA however the government of India and the state governments are responsible to clear the picture in the interest of justice and fair play for which the RTI act publications have been empowered to the citizens of country by virtue of which a responsible officer must be appointed as the PIO and the senior most district level officer should be appointed as the FAA to decide the pending cases of the public accountability .A general notification of the HOD must be highlighted with the position and appointment of the PIO and the FAA with copy to the state chief information commissioner and as regards the duty at government level the Chief Secretary of the state governments are responsible to highlight the position and picture of state secretariat ,so that necessary notification of the appointments for PIOs and FAA may be furnished with the provision made and guaranteed by the study of protocol mentioned in the administration to frame comprehensive plan for the good governance and accountability as required by the constitution of India and also as decided by the study of impact assessment realised by the RTI act publications to benefit citizens of this country .The every citizen of country has been empowered to take cognizance of the RTI act publications and work for the welfare of society and circle  as facing problems due to corruption as well as required  charter of public accountability  Ultimate benefits of the RTI act publications are protected by the individual concerned however in the cases of the corruption the policy of the government ultimately contributing to highlight the details of the complainants for which the RTI activists are working on the captioned subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of protocol mentioned in the monitoring and evaluation of the highlights reported by the annual reporting of the SIC and CIC to the competent authority for removal of corruption and bring transparency in the administration responsible to take disciplinary action against the defaulters however the RTI activist could only be complainant for the good governance and accountability