GOVERNMENT IS ACCOUNTABLE FOR AUTHORITABLE CONTRADICTION OF PENALTIES WITHOUT FOUNDATION AND DECIDE FORMER CASES OF THE ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME AS PER THE PAY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS (3-1-2022) .

Wrong interpretation of law and responsibility for the such act of things with the whistle blowers working for the good governance and accountability under law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India in this behalf.It is a matter of fact and concern that law of limitations could not be exceeded more than three years of crose and pass however in present case of EAE demanding due benefits of ACPS it has gone over and above more than seven years of cross and pass even though the government is duty -bound to take every possible care of such Act and provison made by the law and rules and decide cases according to the notice of the eligibility and accountability under authoritative report of the designated officers as misusing the power plateform of the government duty and responsibility.The increase of said hardship during the period of deemed suspension and the law of limitations could not be declared genuine activities of the disciplinary authority one who has ordered the fourth time Penalty against the functional post EAE on the similar charges of the disobedience even though the department of DOPT is not accepting the charges against the functional post and pay commission recommendations too denying to impose penalty and with held due benefits of the provision made by the law code manual prefixed by the eligibility made and created for the removal of deep long prevailed stagnation of the cadre /grade / post .It is also a matter of fact and concern that penalty enforced and imposed under rule 12 of the CCS&CCA, rules -1965 has been amended to rule 11 by the disciplinary authority which is not understood as why to taking such irregular course of action under law when imposing a penalty like compulsory retirement for more than seven years of duration however said penalty does not amounts to a penalty with in the terms of rule 11 CCS &CCA -rule 1965 but the department taking no cognizance of the advice of the pay commission recommendations so issued vide number Fin -PR-B (7) -1/2021 dated 3-1-2022 .It is believed that department will take cognizance of the pay commission recommendations and necessary statement would be released as the Penalty carry no meanings and enforced without any foundation of the law for which four time Penalty is proof and evidence on the record which is related to the with held of increments, reduction in grade and the compulsory retirement however the reduction in grade is a major penalty against the post of EAE and there is no justification of next Penalty of the compulsory retirement which has been enforced for over than seven years of duration.