DESIGNATED POST EXTRA ASSISTANT ENGINEER COULD NOT DEBARRED FOR PROMOTIONAL POST BY WAY OF PENAL ACTION LIKE REDUCTION IN GRADE AND COMPULSORY RETIREMENT AND DOPT INSTRUCTIONS ISSUED FOR CLARITY ON 3-12-2014 IS PROOF FOR REQUIRED CORRECT OBSERVANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS.

Due to deep long prevailed stagnation in post of junior Engineer working in the department of HPPWD designated post of Extra Assistant Engineer is /was given to the junior Engineer after 18 years of regular service in the scale and grade on 3-10-1991 however as per provision made and created for the first Promotion of government employee he /she would be eligible for first Promotion after 8 years of regular service in the scale and grade, list by way and virtue of which the designated post of Extra Assistant Engineer could not be treated and considered at par with junior Engineer but at par with the Assistant Engineer at least being eligible for higher/highest post and placement of the cadre in preview and for which the option is said to be final and irrevocable one however the state government and the department of Public Works has taken no cognizance of the instructions issued by the DOPT and the administrative reforms clarified on 3-12-14 even complaint referred to the Principal Secretary PWD by the department of Administrative reforms on 10-3-2023 for verification of record and re-examine the former cases of due benefits of Assured Career Progression Scheme. On the other hand the pay commission recommendations issued by the government and the department of Finance is very clear on the captioned subject matter deliberation required to be noticed by the department of Public works where in it is clearly mentioned that the increments of the senior government employees should have not been stopped/withheld by way of penalty or otherwise and option would be considered final and irrevocable one for which the disciplinary authority is responsible to report compliance the matter of penalty like withheld of increments, reduction in grade and the compulsory retirement however wrong interpretation of law code manual prefixed under rule 10(5) (c) of CCS &CCA ,1965 yet continued even though it is clearly mentioned in the para 4 that " In appeal or revision the order is modified into one other than dismissal ,removal or compulsory retirement and no further enquiry is ordered to be held" As such the department should have accepted the letter of modification letter issued by the Secretary of the department instead of opposing the designated seniority of higher post and grade protected again by the pay commission recommendations on 3-1-2022 as already protected on 7-7-2014 and 16-8-2000 and 4-4-1997 however cases finalisation over for 3 months after issue of the pay commission recommendations 3-1-2022 yet kept pending and no statement has been issued by the Head of the office cum Superintending Engineer 10th circle HPPWD Bilaspur even this much cross and pass of the pay commission recommendations issued for due benefits,more over Orders of the HPAT and the High court always depending upon the vision and version of the appointing authority and taking no cognizance of the Finance and the Personnel department responsible for the designated seniority of the cadre /grade/post demanding due benefits in the second channels of Promotion since the upgradation of post in lieu to benefits delivered for others in the joint cadre of AE and the XEN which is highly objectionable matter of fact and concern to be enquired by the department of Administrative reforms however complaints referred by the department of Administrative reforms organisation yet pending for disciplinary action against the defaulters as laid vide number Per (AP-B) -B(11) -2/2004 -16 dated 3-12-14 is proof and evidence on the record of the government and the department concerned.