PENDING CASE FOLLOWED UNDER SECTION 19(6) ACCEPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HPPWD FOR INTERVENTION, UNDER RTI ACT, 2005 .

Yesterday on 14-11-2025 a telephonic massage had been received from the public information officer -cum Section officer PWD -(A) at about 4.00 pm, where in it was told by the branch officer of the public authority concerned that application of the appellant has been accepted by the respectively Principal Secretary (PWD) submitted as on 9-4-2025 before the higher authority for required action taken report on the captioned subject and wrong assessment of case for which now additional Secretary of the public Works department may take further action for intervention under law code manual prefixed by section 19(6) of the right to information Act, 2005 . As such now pending complaint against the public information officer and the FAA would be heard accordingly in the interest of justice and a quasi - judicial function of the Appellant authority where no action has been taken by the public Works department in consultation with the orders and compliance made by department of Finance, Personnel and Administrative reform taking cognisance of the compilation made for review and revision of case and deciding by the OA number 2073/01 dated 18-10-2006 , 3207/2006 and CWP(T) 15857/2008 dated 25-5-2011 but it is regretted for the non compliance at the levels of the Engineer in Chief HPPWD, Shimla and the Chief Engineer HPPWD Hamirpur as well as the Superintending Engineer HPPWD Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh, also responsible for necessary duty described under law code manual prefixed by the section 19(6) of RTI Act, 2005 where the public information officer failed to comply with the decision and conclusion of his FAA since, 10-2-2024 and issue and matter related to pending information on point number 1,3,4&5 has no reply and information by the office of the SE 10th, even number of requests and reminders placed on the record of the said office is proof. As such complaint is pending for the review and reexamine of pending case before the higher authorities since 10-2-2024 and no disciplinary action has been taken by the department as per the review held vide number Per -(AP-B) B-(11) -2/2004 -16 dated, 3-12-2014 and related to AR memo dated, 4-10-2023 , 16-5-2025, and 27-9-2025 is proof, more over decision of pay commission report also issued for the revision of pending cases, if any, existing in the preference and option of an employee (EAE) as concluded vide number PBW-A-B (13) -37/95 dated, 21-5-2004 but the HOD and the disciplinary authority taking no cognisance of the rule 10(5) (c) of CCS&CC&A, 1965 and rule, 11 and unnecessary delaying for the decision-making . Where option and preference of an EAE is /was an under rule obligation, more over penalty doesn't amount to a penalty within the terms of rule 11 however non - compliance is yet continued even date of superannuation of an employee is, 30-4-2014 and department is responsible for adopt the revision of cadre seniority post preferred in the second channel of promotion since 1-11-92 prior to 1-1-1996 being overdue for the higher /highest level promotional avenues in the line of promotion and preferred in the second channel of promotion in this behalf of the benefits to others, working in the joint cadre seniority of AE and EE under quota promotional of the allowed R&P rules applicable to the junior Engineers in the department of public Works during their service career and deployment within the field of choice:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number, 9459334377