RIGHT TO REPEAT COULD NOT BE DENIED TILL CORRECT AND COMPLETE INFORMATION GIVEN TO APPLICANT

An office order related to service matter of applicant has been considered abuse of the RTI process by FAA cum Superintending Engineer 10th Circle HPPWD Bilaspur vide his number 10713-17 dated 18-10-2025 with the observation that " Citizens do not have a right to repeat the same or similar or slightly altered information which he already got " but at the same time complete information has not been provided by the public information officer and the FAA since decision in appeal number 12/2023 dated 30-1-2024 , required to be supllied free of cost by the public information officer and ordered wef time bound confirmation in the decision making ordered to public information officer wef 10-2-2024 for compliance under rule 19(6) of the right to information Act, 2005 . It is also brought to the notice of departments that more than five number OAs have been decided by the HPAT and the High Court of Himalaya Pradesh in the related matter of due benefits of the dynamic ACPS since 3-10-1991 to date of decision and compliance in the matter related to decision of the pending case file but the department has taken no cognisance of the reexamine of case and the positive measures on the captioned subject required for the decision making of this court case as per opinion of the various Courts and the Commissioners taking cognisance of the RTI and the RTS act adjudication for timeline and accuracy and complete information in favor of the applicant for which applicant is demanding complete information from the public information officer and the FAA but there is no decision on the captioned subject required for the good governance and accountability of decision making at the end of public information officer and the FAA where in deciding appeals under the RTI act is a quasi judicial function. It is therefore necessary that the appellate authority should see to it that the justice is not only done, but it should appear to have been done. In order to do so, the order passed by the appellate authority should be a speaking order giving justification for the decision arrived at vide Appeal number 12/2023 dated 30-1-2024 , however, there is no action at the level of public information officer and the FAA and free of cost information neither denied nor released by the office under section 19(6) which is clear cut refusal of the information to applicant and it is necessary to demand for the intervention of the higher authorities, in view to have vacant slots and position of the posts of SIC and SCIC:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal Pradesh phone number 9459334377