It is necessary to clarify the vision and differentiation between the personal liberty of RTI information and the larger public interest of RTI information described under the act ibid to follow and revise the cases

MEETING FOR PANEL DISCUSSION ON GIRISH DESHPANDE JUDGEMENT AND CONCLUSION :--It is a matter of pleasure and concern that a three hour discussion was made on the above mentioned case and judgement by the study of impact assessment so issued in the RTI . Various dignitaries including the former CIC Shri Sailesh Gandhi took part in the held discussion mentioned as above for the highlight of society and circle so that all the groups and organisations as well as the activists may go ahead with this necessity of the time and hour regarding to file their respective appeals and applications with appropriate relevance of the facts findings required to be obtained from the public authorities under the provision of RTI act-2005
The over-all decision of the case has been issued with the fact that the information required for the public interest could not be produced for the concern by said appellant even though there is no logic to deny the information as asked by the study of impact assessment realised by the held discussion on various issues of the judgement concluded by the study and Forum for discussion on 6-6-2020 during the session 4pm to 7pm  I shall not go on the detail but it is necessary to conclude the vision of the videography pronounced at the discussion and business regulatory group of the RTI discussion with the comments that every activist should have try his level best to satisfy the public authorities regarding to justify the difference between the personal liberty and the public interest . As such it is said that more than 40 to 50 percent of the RTI applications are decided on the basis of above mentioned judgement as quoted at higher levels and required informations are not provided to the citizens of society and circle by saying that the information is of the personal liberty and there is no general public interest on the demanded RTI even though the common man is allowed to fight for the welfare of society and circle however he could not get the documentary evidences so required in this behalf of the claim and counter claim placed in the description of the section 8-1 (j) . The discussion made by the forum of study and practice for training and workshop techniques remained very useful and the host  civil society members try their levels best to success the vision CFI held for the welfare of society and circle and also to bring transparency in the administration by way of healthy discussion on such judgements .As such I once again request the all members of groups and society working for the welfare of society and circle regarding to follow the techniques and training skills of the study and system related to the RTI promotion and justify the erroneous deliberations noticed against the act ibid during the course of hearing before the FAA and SIC or CIC and try to create the awareness drive among the masses as well as new era entrants joining the discussion and business regulatory affairs pertinent to the  promotion of RTI act publications made for the good governance of the system delivered to work for the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance however facing such problems of the undue influence by the public authorities and the function for surveillance to disclose the contents of the reality as nothing could be stated  as personal information of the manpower acting adverse against the law and misusing the situation and position of the government empowerment . -- Er F .C . Guleria ( Group leader Bilaspur zone HP) phone 9459334377