ULTIMATELY THE HEADS OF THE DEPARTMENTS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW SUGGESTIVE MEASURES ISSUED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS ORGANIZATION REFERRED UNDER LAW (ARTICLE 350 OF THE CONSTITUTION) OTHERWISE MATTER MAY BE REFERRED TO THE RESPECTIVE CHIEF SECRETARY OF THE GOVERNMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS ORGANIZATION.

RTI activists , Volunteers and the Resource persons working for the welfare of society and circle and doing the needful needs not to worry as a big Organisation recognised as the Administrative Reforms Organisation working for the good governance and charter of public accountability under law code manual at appropriate government level to review and re-examine the delay and dereliction of duty by the PIOs and other concerned responsible for the good governance and accountability however the race is required to be destinated by the fact and concern to be taken in hand by the individual concerned and the Organisation will prepare for verification report and enquire into the matter reported by the RTI activists and Volunteers working for the welfare of society and circle and taking cognizance of the wrong interpretation of law and rules.At the same time every body has a different definition of the success brought on the record of the department of Administrative reforms organisation which is actually measured by the satisfaction of the appropriate government whether to improve the suggestive measures referred by the RTI activists and Volunteers working for the welfare of society and circle and doing the needful. No doubt it is important to aim high with the objective of Promotion of the RTI and RTS act adjudication working for the good governance and accountability at government level but ultimately the decision is required to be taken by the government and the department of the Administrative reforms organisation from where the case file may be sent to the Head of Departments and too the respective Chief Secretary of the government. Although it is too important to bring it to the notice of the Court of law if kept pending and undecided however the instructions issued by the government and required to be followed by the department concerned are ultimately processed by the Heads of the department from where further information could be obtained under law code manual prefixed by the government in this behalf.The vigilance department of the government and the department concerned is too resposible to follow time to time issued instructions of the appropriate government and do the needful failing which the Organisation may follow criminal justice law directly through the FIRs .