SECTION 19(6) OF THE RTI ACT, 2005 MAKING ENTIRE DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE TO HAVE INTERVENTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ORDERS.

Some public authorities had been blaming the RTI activists and volunteers that these people are interfering in the work and conduct of government functioning and unnecessary creating problems to their discharge of duty at the levels of public information officers and the FAA of SIC and CIC, as the case may be, but in the real sense of duty under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf, people may take accountability and charter of public service guarantee from the government corridor for which the RTI activists and volunteers may follow section 19(6) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and have justice from the public authorities in this behalf of the delay and dereliction of duty, however the public authorities are not aware about their function under the provision made for quasi - judicial function of the right to information Act, 2005 , declared responsible for deciding the things accordingly and to issue a speaking order for the access to information under the provision made and asked for the transparency in administration. It is particularly mentioned here that the public information officers and the First Appellate authorities are reluctant to work as quasi judical function of the Act ibid and generally writing to the appellant and the applicants that said information is not available in the office and they may follow appeals before the FAA and the SIC or CIC, as the case may be. As such it is becoming necessary to follow section 19(6) and have complaints before the Heads of the departments and the Secretary of the state Government from where one may get intervention from the government corridor , required for the decision making under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India in this behalf and for which the general public is also responsible to challenge the amendments and alteration of the government recently issued in the RTI act, 2005 and the labour codes as well as the Mahatma Gabdhi National rural employment guarantee Act made for the welfare of the general public and the poor people living in the society and circle. It is therefore necessary for the RTI activists and volunteers regarding to intervene in the such cases of the Right to Information Act, 20O5 and have justice from the FAA and the higher authorities as such the departments are held responsible for access to information and no one should deny to intervention for this cause of the duty under law code manual prefixed by the relevant action in this behalf as described below " Deciding appeals under the RTI act is a quasi-judicial function. It is, therefore necessary that the appellant authority should see to it that the justice is not only done, but it should also appear to have been done. In order to do so, the order passed by the appellant authority should be a speaking order giving justification for the decision arrived at:-- Er Fateh chand Guleria, Director RTI welfare Association registered number HPCD, 3552 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh phone number, 9459334377