Showing posts with label SOCIAL JUSTICE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SOCIAL JUSTICE. Show all posts

DISPOSAL OF FIRST APPEALS UNDER THE RTI ACT, 2005 AND AGREEMENT WITH THE DECISION SO ISSUED VIDE DoPT MEMO NUMBER 10/23/2007 DATED 9-7-2007 , CONSIDERING FAA FOR THE QUASI-JUDICIAL FUNCTION

In the present system of democratic review and reforms related to the social justice development oriented politics of the country honest road map objective of the caste based census has been cleared by the all political parties and now there is no threat and challenge on the issue and matter related to permanent national cohesion but a prerequisite for the genuine inclusion of need to reclaim the benefits, keeping in view the Supreme Court decision to have complex social realities where state Governments have been made responsible to safe guard the interest of the poorest among the poors and do needful under law code manual prefixed by the Constitution of India, in this behalf , however people are taking no cognisance of the aim and objective of the honourable Supreme Court of India where reservation has been denied over and above the quota slots of fifty percent beneficiaries. As such the Government is too responsible to follow time to time issued orders and decisions of the honourable Supreme Court of India and verify the genuine claims of the general categories where these people are not getting even single promotion during their service carriers and too getting no time scales for the placement of higher and highest levels of the promotional avenues which is clear cut injustice with the general categories and the government must review their cases at par with the Junior for which the department of personnel and administrative reforms has already issued directions to the all state governments regarding to follow DoPT memo dated 9-7-2007 , as pointed out by the CIC that some of the Ministries/Departments have appointed very junior officers as Appellate authorities, who are not in a position to enforce their orders. The Act provides that the first appellate authority would be an officer senior in rank to the CPIO. Thus, the Appellate authority, as per provisions of the Act, would be an officer in a Commanding position, vis -a - vis the CPIO. Nevertheless, if, in any case, the CPIO doesn't implement the order passed by the appellate authority and the Appellate authority feels that intervention of higher authority is required to get his order implemented, he should bring the matter to the notice of the officer in the public authority competent to take against the CPIO. Such competent officer shall take necessary action so as to ensure implementation of the provisions of the RTI Act:-- Er fateh Chand Guleria phone number 9459334377 , Bilaspur Himachal pradesh

REPRESENTATION FURNISHED BY THE RTI ACTIVIST COULD NOT DENIED FOR RE EXAMINE OF THE CASE WITH THE PLEA THAT SUBJECT MATTER PERTINENT TO THE RTI AND IS NOT ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER

The RTI informations asked by the RTI activists are actually related to the problems of the Citizens of country list by way and virtue of which the Applicants in question try his level best to resolve the said problem for which the Applicants in huse necessity applied through the RTI application filed under the RTI act publications to take benefit of the required information .As such after obtaining the RTI requirements from the public authorities said documents are placed before the competent higher authority for review and re-examine of case which is actually demanded by the RTI activists under law code manual and the lieu of the Administrative reforms for which the only department concerned is responsible from where said information and documents are obtained by the RTI activists however it is regretted to point that the representation submitted by the RTI activists are not attended properly and in the contrary it is replied to the RTI activists that the matter is Administrative and not come under the purview of the RTI act publications which is wrong and illegal as such the department concerned is too responsible to follow and protect the rights of the Citizens of Society and circle for which the public authorities could not refuse to attend the said observation of the administrative reforms and so brought to the notice of the department concerned for further action in the matter pertinent to the Case file of applicant and requested by the RTI activist for redressal of grievances failing which there is no logic to defend the system of administrative reforms and brought to the notice of the department concerned and the HOD and stare govt of the department concerned may initiate disciplinary action against the defaulters denying to attend the representation submitted by the RTI activist after having documents obtained from the system of governance too responsible to protect the fundamental rights of the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance

COMPLAINT CELLS MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE SYSTEM FOR SERVICE RENDERED TO THE APPELLANTS UNDER LAW CODE MANUAL OF THE RTI ACT, TO REPORT MATTER FURTHER

In fact application under RTI act -2005 is continuously empowering citizens of the country to take use and exercise of this fundamental right for the interest of individual society as well as circle but it is regretted to point the delay in decision of cases at the levels of PIO and FAA as well as the SIC and CIC even thought time limits are prescribed  for considerations of the held proceedings but these are generally ignored at the every level of review and revision by decisive authority which is highly objectionable matter of suspect to be enquired by who and when as such and more over it has  become general tendency of the departmental authorities not to exercise its powers and function delivered under section 18 to 20 even though an enquiry may be initiated on the reasonable grounds  of unnecessary delay misleading  the applicants releasing incorrect and incomplete information and access to information with in the time limit specified more so while taking cognisance of wrong interpretation  of provision  made regarding the enquiring into the cases processed by the lower forum of enquiry the act delivers the same powers as are vested in a civil court and trying a suit under the code of civil Procedure-1908 and during the course of enquiries of any complaint  the CIC or the SIC may examine any record to which this Act applies and which is  under the control of public authority and no such record may be with held from it on any grounds however it is regretted to point the action at the levels of SIC and CIC which is clear cut injustice with the Appellant for which separate complaint cell at higher level of the government is necessary or the SIC and CIC may follow revision of such cases processed under the code of Civil Procedure- 1908 failing which there is no implementation of the powers empowered as to function the cases in Appeal as well as penalties and how transparency in administration could be assured and granted when appeals are partly decided  and provision of the code of Civil Procedure -1908 remained silent on the issue and matter  even penalties and power to give notice of its decision including any right of Appeal to the complainant and the public authority  has too been prescribed with the procedure under the Act ibid

RTI ACT ADJUDICATION ARE FRUITFUL HOW EVER PEOPLE ARE RELUCTANT TO JOIN HANDS

RTI welfare associations are are working for the welfare of society and circle and watching the interests of democracy in the interest of justice and transparency in the administration as facing problems due to corruption however people are not taking interest in the promotion of RTI act publications even though RTI has been empowered to initiate the process of legal remedies up to the level of State information commission and the Central information commission by way and virtue of which the Applicants may process their rights and privileges up to the SIC and through the way out by FAA but it is regretted to point that the people are reluctant to follow the law code manual of the RTI act publications list by way and virtue of which public authorities have also started ignorance of law and code for charter of public accountability even though the RTI act publications are very clear on the captioned subject matter deliberation noticed by the study of protocol mentioned in the description of the act for empowerment delivered to the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance.As such it is necessary to protect the fundamental rights of the common man and initiate the process of awareness drive for workshop training and techniques of the new era entrants interested to join the webinar and seminars arranged by the various groups and organisations of the RTI act publications .The people of country must join hands with the RTI act publications as said act has been particularly issued for the good governance and accountability failing which the benefits of the RTI act publications would be automatically deleted and delayed as the public authorities are taking no cognizance of the issued guidelines and Applicants are facing problems as such due to unusual practice and behaviour of the Public authorities

RTI ACT ADJUDICATION ARE FRUITFUL HOW EVER PEOPLE ARE RELUCTANT TO JOIN HANDS

RTI ACT ADJUDICATION ARE FRUITFUL HOW EVER PEOPLE ARE RELUCTANT TO JOIN HANDS

RTI ACT ADJUDICATION ARE FRUITFUL HOW EVER PEOPLE ARE RELUCTANT TO JOIN HANDS

RTI AWARENESS IS NECESSARY TO GET BENEFITS OF SOCIAL AUDIT AND JUSTICE REQUIRED FOR THE GOOD GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPARENCY IN THE ADMINISTRATION

SOCIAL AUDIT IS THE BEST WAY OF RTI MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Three types of social audits are mainly used and exercised by the study of protocol mentioned in the law code manual of the verification of record and statements related and pertinent to the monitoring and evaluation as well as the indeed of a policy of the law which includes Government or the institutional audits , social audit and the people's audit The government audits are conducted without the significant involvement of the affected people or the intended beneficiaries where as the people's audit are conducted by the people themselves, including those who are directly affected and with the assistance and movement of the NGOs but invariably with sincere efforts to involve the concerned department or the institutions.The social audits are conducted jointly by the government and the people especially by those people who are affected or are intended beneficiaries of the activity being audited.Generally the social audit is conducted by the study of impact assessment realised by the resource person and through the investigation under RTI act publications particularly issued for the welfare of society and circle with the empowerment delivered by Constitution of India as facing problems like delay in deciding the cases and transpancy in the administration as well as removal of corruption from the society and circle/ Admininistration.