DOPT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF (AR) AS WELL AS THE (SIC) MUST HAVE CONCLUSION ON THE DEMANDS OF THE CLARITY AND TRANSPARENCY BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE BY THE GROUP OF MEMBERS WORKING FOR THE PROVISION MADE AND CREATED FOR THE ACCOUNTABILITY

RTI activists Association Registered number HPCD 3552 working for the welfare of society and circle with in the Himachal Pradesh public serveillance noticed by the study of protocol mentioned in the Administrative reforms of the government Admininistration continuesly performing its duty and responsibility even restrictions on the working due to covid-19 pandemic could not hamper much more to the group of people following all the protocol strictly and too arranging the meetings and events on the procedural processing by the Public authorities as well as the SIC for which the Complaints have too been brought to the kind notice of the appropriate government where found necessary by the study of impact assessment realised by the Group of members Registered with the state government for required objective and achievements of the provision made and created for the good governance and accountability . It is necessary to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens and remain offensive for which the deeper thinking , rethinking on the subject matter deliberation of adjudication noticed by the FAA and SIC or CIC has been essentially required to take benefit of the Appeal filed and Complaints furnished under section 18 to 20 of the RTI act adjudication, being responsible to fight for the right cause of the demand under public utilities for which now the Public service guarantee act 2011 too helping the people of Society and circle as related to the charter of public accountability and transparency preferred under the law code manual prefixed for the good governance and accountability by the constitution of India. It has been also observed by the house of members that Act may be well used and exercised by the applicants by way of consulting help books and taking the Advise from the key members of the  guides and the senior colleagues working for the fast track justice through online digital portals and Programmes as well as events organised by the group of members and the state coordination  committee moving forward with the aim and objective of the awareness drive and promotion of RTI act publications and too the Public service guarantee act 2011 as facing problems due to unusual practice of the delay in deciding the cases and unnecessary creating hurdles in the Administrative reforms issued in lieu of the empowerment captured by the citizens of country in the identity of volunteer and the resource person, and introducing before the entire government for redressal of grievances under provision made and created for the good governance and accountability

SECTION 18 AND 19 OF THE RTI ACT ADJUDICATION MUST BE FOLLOWED BY THE SYSTEM FOR SERVICE RENDERED BY THE SIC OR CIC IN THE CONCLUSION OF THE DECISION OF APPEAL AS WELL AS THE COMPLAINT SO REQUIRED IN THE CASE FILE

RTI has been declared as the fundamental right of Citizens with the empowerment for time bound provision made by the government to protect the transpancy as well as charter of public accountability in the interest of justice and free and fair deal under the law code manual prefixed by the constitution of India in this behalf since 2005 .As regards the action plan under section 18 and 19 of the RTI act publications it is primary duty of the applicants to follow time bound Schedule under RTI act publications since Application under section 6 till date of the required documents and references are not made available and processed under law code manual of the RTI act publications for which Complaint under section 18 as well as the appeal under section 19 both are required to be maintained and updated by the Activists responsible to protect his fundamental rights issued by the constitution of India to get benefits of the charter of public accountability prefixed by the government under penal action against the defaulters and incase of more clarity such Complaints could also be furnished with the HOD and the Secretary of the department as responsible for the disciplinary action