MINISTRY OF ELECTRONICS AND THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HAS CHALLENGED THE WORK AND CONDUCT OF WHAT'S APP , FB TO ABIDE BY THE SYSTEM UNDER LAW

The union Government has stated before the Delhi High court that it is the legal obligation of Social media intermediateries Face Book and the What's app to evolve a mechanism to identify who was the first to send a message that has been forwarded to the others for which technical difficulty could not be any excuse to deny the legal compliance. The subject matter deliberation required to be maintained by the all concerned as related to the" Dangerous invasion of privacy" and defeat a concept known as end - to- end encryption. As such What's app was the first big company to challenge the information technology guidelines and ethics Digital Media Code Rules 2021 .The government is rejecting the position with high technical infrastructure, user base , revenue base and feeling the necessity of appropriate mechanism required to identify the unlawful informations origin and the first Indian originator of the such information. The IT Rules have already been stayed by the multiple High courts where in petitioners are challenging the other sections some of which pertains to the Social media companies and the streaming content service providers like Netflix, for executive over reach and the other violations of the constitutional provisions. It is well clear that the What's app collects users personal information and shares it with face book and the third party entities for business / Commercial purposes hence are not legally entitled to claim that it protects privacy. The said documents have been filled by the Ministry of electronics and information technology.

COURTS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE PERFORMANCE MADE BY THE SYSTEM FOR SERVICE UNDER RTI AND ACT AS PER THE FUNDAMENTAL

It is fundamental duty of the public authorities delivering the information to Applicants, volunteers, Activists and the resource persons under law code manual of the RTI act publications to prove the facts especially with in the knowledge and experience as well as the principles as such at many stages it is expedited by the study of protocol mentioned in courts of law and justice with objection that the informations delivered by the RTI could not be considered factual which is not correct under law code manual of RTI act publications as such said informations are based on the record and furnished by the government servants for demand under public utilities by way and virtue of which the informations if not reliable could be challenged before the FAA and SIC or CIC however genuineness of the information could not be declared fraudulent or incorrect as such the government machinery should be held responsible for such consequences instead of   declaring the informations unreliable .The courts are also responsible to review such cases under law code manual prefixed by the law and rules and impose penalties if doing irregularities , issuing misconstrued informations to the Applicants and cheating the common man demanding free and fair justice from the system of governance.

WHAT IS PUBLIC INFORMATION AND HOW IT COULD BE OBTAINED

Friends the people have right to verify the facts what the government as well court and the public authorities doing in the public domain to look after the welfare of society and circle. The information if asked by the applicant from the public authoritiy in the interest of justice and transparency in the administration as well as removal of corruption from the administration is too demanded for the agenda of discussion and expression by way and virtue of which the said statement of the reknown senior Advocate Shri Prashant Bhushan is also an information related to the public domain and there is no logic to unnecessary criticise the highlights referred above . Every information which has been declared as the public information should not be criticised by the RTI activists as such the RTI activists are working for the welfare of society and circle in the interest of justice and transparency in the administration and there is no reason to unnecessary criticise the highlights of the public domain as issued for the welfare of society and circle and in the interest of monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the courts order protected by Shri Prashant Bhushan as a senior advocate of the supreme court of India and definitely his trial on the issue and matter would help the objective of the RTI promotion and wellness drive continued for the agenda of discussion and awareness drive launched in this behalf of the strategy for further information and decision by the court of law

REGARDING PERSONAL GRIEVANCES AND REDRESSAL ON THE DIGITAL PLATFORM:

REGARDING PERSONAL GRIEVANCES AND REDRESSAL ON THE DIGITAL PLATFORM:-- The meeting proposed for Online discussion on various issues and topics must have personal  problems before the key members called for the guidance for resolving problems of the RTI members .The decision in the courts as well as too under the provision of RTI act are issued on the basis of documentary evidences and proof placed on the record .The arguments highlighted before the competent authority by the activists or too by the advocates are being considered by the court of law .No double that the SIC or CIC have been empowered under the code of civil procedure-1908 however there powers are restricted to follow the original application of the applicants by and virtue of which they could not be held responsible for the implementation of the administrative orders even though the FAA is responsible to implement the administrative reforms presented in this behalf of the duty and responsibility under prescribed manual of the confirmations related to the administrative reforms for which the government is responsible to initiate disciplinary action against the official. As such the courts and the administrative authorities are only responsible to protect the fundamental rights of the society and circle and the RTI act may be exercised by the citizens to get the informatory descriptions and details of the facts finding existing in the records of the public authorities. The final authority would remain the High court of state and the the Administrative head of the state government .The penal action on the grounds of delay and disciplinary action on the grounds of wrong interpretation of RTI act must have appropriate look and observation at the level of the SIC or CIC