REQUEST TO DECIDE FORMER CASES OF ACPS ISSUED PRIOR TO 1-1-1996 TO THE CADRE OF JUNIOR ENGINEERS AND STILL PENDING FOR ADJUDICATION EVEN FINAL ORDERS OF THE ALL CONCERNED

REQUEST TO DECIDE FORMER CASES OF ACPS  ISSUED PRIOR TO 1-1-1996 TO THE CADRE OF JUNIOR ENGINEERS AND STILL PENDING FOR ADJUDICATION EVEN FINAL ORDERS OF THE ALL CONCERNED:--It is a matter of fact and concern that benefits of the Assured career progression scheme issued to all regular employees of the state government with in a period of ten years have been released but the cases of JEs have yet no final review and re-examine of the placement encadred as laid by the DOPT and too instructed by the department of finance being final authority to decide the pending cases. It is particularly mentioned here that the cadre of junior Engineer had been found and verified stagnated and provision of the higher post and grade of EAE issued after 18 years of the regular service on 3-10-91 to recover the promotional losses of the cadre / grade / post however neither increments allowed after 8-16-24-32 years of service have been issued to the cadre on completion of  24 and 32 years of the post held in the same grade nor due FR -22 released to the higher post of EAE even clarity vide HP finance memo dated 7-7-14 and HP Personnel memo dated  3-12-14 is proof and evidence on the record for which it is necessary to the concerned department to follow advise of the Finance and the Personnel departments or take necessary Advise for completing the very old agenda and assured benefits to beneficiaries .It is particularly mentioned here that the Honble Punjab and Haryana High court have also decided the similar cases of JEs and AEs in their favour during 2019 to follow law of limitations as per the charter of public accountability however still there is no required action in the state of HP even this much cross and pass of the conclusion by HP finance and Personnel .The delay in deciding the cases would be personal responsibility of the concerned department as they had been declared and made responsible for further conclusion or to take necessary Advise for the required action from the final authority of ACPS ie HP finance and Personnel.It is further submitted in the matter that application of rule 10(5) (c) of CCS & CCA rules 1965 has also been enforced by the department of HPPWD to obstruct the progressive measures released by the government in this behalf to the cadre / grade / post but no appropriate action has been taken to follow the removal of deemed suspension even the  three years of the law of limitations has been described in this behalf of the reinstatement of such cases for which the said penalties like with held of increments , reduction in grade and compulsory retirement of an employee has been found illegal and declared null and void with in the meanings of rule -11 as overdue for the next promotion in semblance to the eligibility criteria for others in the joint cadre but it is regretted to point that cases finalized by the secretary PWD before 1-1-2006 are still lying pending with the DDOs for due benefits.protected under rule -6 of the rules 1998 of the ACPS and due within the eligibility criteria of quota promotion for which option is required to be collected for in the every calendar year of the preference by concerned vide HP finance memo dated 4-4-1997 and the HP Personnel memo dated 3-12-14, 1-9-10 and 24-12-81 is proof and evidence but it is regretted for the wrong interpretation of the held departmental proceedings at the level of DDOs even clarifications have been issued by the Chief Engineers concerned and HOD had also verfied the the introduction.and referred to the government for further decision and conclusion as reported by the all concerned to finalize the agenda of benefits to cadre / grade / post as such the seniority of the appointment of post and grade protected by the individual has been described under rule 10 (5)(c) -4 is confirmation of the decision and conclusion which has been declared valid in the capacity of individual with the comments '' In appeal or revision the order is modified into one other than dismissal removal or compulsory retirement and no further enquiry is ordered to be held.